Object data
oil on canvas
support: height 85 cm × width 117 cm
Pauwels van Hillegaert
c. 1621 - c. 1625
oil on canvas
support: height 85 cm × width 117 cm
The plain-weave canvas support has been lined and the tacking edges were cut off. Cusping is visible on all sides. The ground layer has a whitish colour. The painting was executed smoothly, with visible brushstrokes in the sky and the ground in the foreground. Small hatchings define the modelling of the horses.
Fair. The painting is slightly abraded, particularly in the sky. The retouchings and varnish are discoloured.
...; transferred from Paleis Het Loo, Apeldoorn, to Huis ten Bosch, The Hague, 18 September 1798;1...; first recorded in the museum in 1800/01, as Esaias van de Velde;2 on loan to the Oranje-Nassau Museum, The Hague, 1926-32
Object number: SK-A-452
Copyright: Public domain
Pauwels van Hillegaert (Amsterdam c. 1596 - Amsterdam 1640)
Pauwels van Hillegaert was born into a southern Netherlandish immigrant family in Amsterdam. This was around 1596, for in a document of 1620 he is said to be 24 years old. The name of his teacher is not known. He married Anneken Hoomis of Antwerp in 1620 in Amsterdam. In 1639 he was a member of the Amsterdam civic guard, and appears as such in a militia piece by Nicolaes Eliasz Pickenoy.3 He was buried in Amsterdam on 10 February 1640.
Van Hillegaert is usually referred to as a ‘battle painter’ in the archives. Today he is better known for siege scenes with princes Maurits and Frederik Hendrik and for equestrian portraits of them than for cavalry battles. He often made several versions of his paintings, and probably worked mainly for the open market and less often on commission for the House of Orange or official bodies. His earliest known work dates from 1619. He may have supplied the figures in a landscape by Alexander Keirincx. His work is closely related to that of Henri Ambrosius Pacx.
His two sons, Francois I (1621-60) and Paulus II (1631-58), became painters too, and were probably his pupils and followers. After their father’s death Francois inherited ‘all his father’s painting implements, likewise the drawings by the same together with all the unfinished paintings’.4
Yvette Bruijnen, 2007
References
Bredius III, 1917, pp. 828-29; Hofstede de Groot in Thieme/Becker XVII, 1924, pp. 93-94; Briels 1997, p. 337; Van Maarseveen 1998a, pp. 83, 86, 103
The Princes of Orange and members of their families are riding out of the Buitenhof in The Hague. They include William the Silent, his sons Maurits and Frederik Hendrik, the ‘Winter King’ Frederick V and his wife Elizabeth Stuart, and several members of the Frisian branch of the House of Nassau. In the right background are the buildings between the Hofvijver lake and the Binnenhof, and the Stadholders’ Quarter.5 This is an imaginary group of riders, for some were already dead when the painting was made. It can thus be regarded as a dynastic portrait of the House of Orange-Nassau and was evidently a popular one, for several versions of it are known. Although the painting is not listed in the old inventories of Paleis Het Loo, it was from there that it was transferred to Huis ten Bosch in 1798.6 This suggests that it was intended for the stadholder himself, or one of his courtiers.
The painting entered the Rijksmuseum as a work by Esaias van de Velde7 before being attributed to David Vinckboons in 1809,8 and then, in 1887, to Van Hillegaert.9 Hofstede de Groot doubted this attribution, and gave it instead to Henri Ambrosius Pacx after comparison with a painting signed by Pacx in Naples.10 This was followed by a few authors,11 but generally the attribution to Van Hillegaert has rightly been retained.12 The style corresponds to that of known authentic works by Van Hillegaert, particularly as regards the distinctive modelling of the horses and dogs. The rendering of the figures and the architecture is also closely related to that in Van Hillegaert’s Disbanding of the ‘Waardgelders’ (SK-A-155). The attribution to Van Hillegaert is strengthened even further by the fact that there are literal repetitions of some of the riders in other compositions of his and his workshop. The figure of Frederik Hendrik on the rearing horse in the centre foreground is exactly the same as in Princes Maurits and Frederik Hendrik on Horseback (SK-A-568), and is repeated as an anonymous rider in the left foreground in Van Hillegaert’s signed Disbanding of the ‘Waardgelders’ dated 1627. Prince Maurits, just left of the centre foreground in the present painting, is seen in mirror image in Princes Maurits and Frederik Hendrik on Horseback. In addition, the rider pointing straight ahead behind and to the right of Frederik Hendrik, who is probably Ernst Casimir, recurs in Prince Frederik Hendrik and Count Ernst Casimir at the Siege of ’s-Hertogenbosch (SK-A-607). These examples are not only a powerful argument for the attribution to Van Hillegaert, but are also evidence that he used model drawings for individual riders.
There are several surviving versions of this painting, the one in the Mauritshuis being the most closely related (fig. a). It is much larger than the one in the Rijksmuseum, despite being cropped at the top and on the right, and is widely regarded as the prototype and the finest version.13 It was formerly attributed to Pacx, but Van Suchtelen recently put forward cogent arguments for giving it to Van Hillegaert. Another version, in a private collection, can also be ascribed to him.14 Whether the Mauritshuis painting was indeed the prototype, or whether the artist made several versions at the same time, is impossible to say.
Two other versions that are usually associated with the above three are too far removed in style for them to be given to the artist.15 They contain fewer portraits, are more elongated, and are closer to the signed painting by Pacx in Naples, in that the figures and horses are far squatter than those in the Van Hillegaert.
The architecture is based on an etching of 1621 by Simon Frisius after a design by Hendrick Hondius.16 The buildings of the Stadholders’ Quarter and the Stadhouderspoort were only completed in 1621, which establishes a terminus post quem for the painting.17 The absence of Amalia van Solms, whom Frederik Hendrik married in 1625, is a plausible argument for dating the work before that year.
Yvette Bruijnen, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 122.
Dumas in Leeuwarden etc. 1979, p. 45, no. 9; Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, pp. 651-52 (as attributed to Henri Ambrosius Pacx); Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 293-94, no. 144 (as attributed to Henri Ambrosius Pacx); Van Suchtelen in coll. cat. The Hague 2004a, p. 129
1801, p. 51, no. 139 (as Esaias van de Velde); 1809, p. 78, no. 333 (as David Vinckboons); 1843, p. 65, no. 357 (as David Vinckboons; ‘in good condition’); 1858, p. 155, no. 344 (as David Vinckboons); 1880, pp. 328-29, no. 383 (as David Vinckboons); 1887, p. 63, no. 502; 1903, p. 127, no. 1180; 1934, p. 130, no. 1180; 1960, pp. 134-35, no. 1180; 1976, p. 275, no. A 452; 2007, no. 122
Y. Bruijnen, 2007, 'Pauwels van Hillegaert, Prince Maurits, Accompanied by Prince Frederik Hendrik, Frederick V of Bohemia and his Wife Elizabeth Stuart, and Others, on the Buitenhof, The Hague, c. 1621 - c. 1625', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.8685
(accessed 10 November 2024 17:32:05).