Memorial triptych (formerly called the Gertz memorial triptych) with the Lamentation (centre panel), nine male donor portraits with St John the Evangelist (inner left wing), nine female donor portraits with the Virgin and Child (inner right wing), St Peter (outer left wing) and St Mary Magdalen (outer right wing)
Low Countries, after c. 1527
Memorial triptych (formerly called the Gertz memorial triptych) with the Lamentation (centre panel), nine male donor portraits with St John the Evangelist (inner left wing), nine female donor portraits with the Virgin and Child (inner right wing), St Peter (outer left wing) and St Mary Magdalen (outer right wing)
Object data
Oil on panel
support: height 84 cm (centre panel) × width 105.3 cm (centre panel) × height 86 cm (left wing) × width 46 cm (left wing) × height 86 cm (right wing) × width 46 cm (right wing) height 177 cm × width c. 246 cm × depth 6.5 cm
Inscriptions
inscription, upper right, centre panel, on Mary Magdalen’s collar: MAGD...
inscription, on the lower portion of the attached frame of the centre panel: Hier legghen begraven willem gertz die starf an[n]o m ccccc en xxxiiii den xiii marcij stijntgen dirck claessens starf anno xxxi den vi septembris maria willemsz starf an[n]o xxxviii den v aprilis anna willemsz starf an[n]o xxxvii den xiiii septe[m]bris. bidt voer die zielen (Here lie Willem Gertz, who died on the 13th of March 1534, Stijntgen Dirck Claessens, who died on the 6th of September 1531, Maria Willemsz, who died on the 5th of April 1538, Anna Willemsz, who died on the 14th of September 1537. Pray for their souls)
inscription, left outer wing, top: 15
inscription, right outer wing, top: 61
Technical notes
The support of the centre panel consists of four horizontally grained oak planks (18.3, 23.6, 23 and 19.1 cm), and is bevelled on all sides and thinned at the joins. The reverse is unpainted and has been roughly chiselled. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1469. The panel could have been ready for use by 1480, but a date in or after 1494 is more likely. The whitish ground was applied up to the edges of the panel, is noticeably thin in certain areas, and is visible through losses in the paint layer. The remains of a barbe are present on the right side, but there appears to be no barbe along the upper edge. The left side and bottom of the panel are covered by the frame and could not be inspected. There is no underdrawing visible with the naked eye. The paint layers were applied smoothly, though some ornamental details in the clothing are in a thicker yellow paint. The clothing of the figure on the far left (Joseph of Arimathaea) appears to be underpainted in grisaille and then built up with a thick glaze and highlights. Gilding was applied on two levels with a pigmented oil mordant; the background behind the figures, which is gilded and shaded using glazes, is overlapped by a second layer of thin gilded lines radiating from Christ’s head. The figures were reserved.
The support of both wings consists of two vertically grained planks, probably oak (23.6 and 22.4 cm; 22.9 and 23.1 cm). A whitish ground was applied to both sides of both wings when the panels were already mounted in their frames, as there are unpainted edges and traces of a barbe on all sides. The contour lines of the underdrawing are visible in the faces with the naked eye. The wings are painted on both sides. In the right panel slight adjustments were made to the hands and collar of the praying woman with her hands on a book and to the foot of the angel. The brushwork in both panels is rough and the painted surface is generally flat. Thick glazes are visible in the red clothing of several of the figures. The figures were reserved.
Scientific examination and reports
dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 26 October 1995
condition report: I. Verslype, RMA, 16 August 2006
dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 12 January 2007
Condition
Poor. The centre panel has small losses and is slightly abraded. The glazes have faded, particularly in the clothing of the figure on the far left (Joseph of Arimathaea). The varnish is irregular and discoloured. There are also small losses throughout both wings. There is minimal discoloured retouching on the inner wings, but significant discoloured retouching and abrasion on the exteriors. The varnish of the wings is very discoloured.
Original framing
The profiles of the central frame and those of the frames surrounding the wings are the same. The cross-section of the profile shows mouldings composed of a tenia, a bevel, a bead, a fillet, a scotia and a bead on the sight edge (fig. c). The sill has a wide bevel at the sight edge (fig. d). The rear lip of the rebate on the central frame has been removed, but originally the panel was set in a closed rebate. The frames are constructed with stub mortise and tenon joints, secured with dowels (fig. e). The outside and the tenia are painted black and the mouldings are gilded. Attached to the top and bottom of the central frame are two carved cartouches. Although the pieces are now attached with modern hardware, there are old dowels in the frame that may be part of the original attachment. These cartouches may be original, or early additions. The top cartouche has two faces and a shield, and is painted black, white and blue, and partly gilded. On the bottom cartouche are Gothic letters in gold on an abraded black background. Although abraded, the finish on the cartouches is better preserved than on the frame itself, which is overpainted.
Provenance
...; from the estate of Johannes Bosboom (1817-91), The Hague, fl. 100, to the museum, 1892
Hugo van der Goes (Ghent c. 1440 - Rode Klooster, near Brussels, 1482), copy after
Hugo van der Goes was most probably born in Ghent, where he is first documented on 5 May 1467 on his enrolment in the local Guild of St Luke. During the subsequent decade he received a steady stream of commissions from Ghent’s city authorities, foreign patrons and members of the Burgundian nobility. In 1468 he travelled to Bruges to assist with the decorations for the wedding of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, and Margaret of York, and in 1469 and 1472 he was paid for decorations and heraldic paintings made on the occasion of the duke’s triumphal entries into Ghent. He was appointed dean of the St Luke’s Guild in Ghent early in 1474, and served in that capacity for at least a year, prior to seeking refuge in the monastery of the Rode Klooster near Brussels and joining the community as a lay brother. According to the account of Gaspar Ofhuys (Originale Coenobii Rubeavallis, c. 1509-13), Van der Goes’s fame pursued him into the cloister, where he continued to paint and receive illustrious guests, among them the future Emperor Maximilian I. Ofhuys reports that five or six years after entering the Rode Klooster, Van der Goes was stricken by a severe mental illness, and despite the care he received from his fellow monks died shortly afterwards in 1482.
No signed works by Van der Goes survive today, and the only extant painting that is attested to by a closely contemporary source is the Portinari Altarpiece, a triptych commissioned by Tommaso Portinari, a Medici banking agent based in Bruges.1 In his 1550 edition of the Vite, Giorgio Vasari identifies Van der Goes (‘Ugo d’Anversa’) as the artist responsible for the triptych. Other major works firmly attributed to him based on stylistic comparison include the Monforte Altarpiece in Berlin (SK-A-2150), fig. a) and The Death of the Virgin in Bruges (SK-A-3467, fig. a). Several other compositions attributed to him are known only through subsequent copies, among them the lost Lamentation from which the Rijksmuseum copy derives (SK-A-4488).
References
Vasari 1568, I, p. 51; Van Mander 1604, fols. 203v-04r; Friedländer in Thieme/Becker XIX, 1921, pp. 311-13; Friedländer IV, 1926, pp. 9-98; ENP IV, 1969, pp. 11-55; Campbell 1974, pp. 3-7; Sander 1992, pp. 15-23; Miedema II, 1995, pp. 230-38; Reynolds in Turner 1996, XII, pp. 844-51; Dhanens 1998, pp. 23-27, 52-67, 384-402; Rüter in Saur LVII, 2008, pp. 50-54
(Marissa Bass)
Entry
This triptych, formerly presumed to have marked the burial site of Willem Gertz and his family, is a complex assemblage with a long history. Its centre panel is among the best extant copies after Hugo van der Goes’s lost Lamentation, one of the most admired and frequently reproduced compositions of 15th-century Netherlandish art. The wings of the triptych, dated precisely by the year 1561 painted across the tops of their exteriors, portray a cluster of donor portraits in a style contemporary to the mid-16th century and wholly distinct from that of the Lamentation depicted in the centre panel. The ornamented panels that adjoin the upper and lower edges of the centre panel’s original frame were probably added even later, perhaps in the 19th century.
In the Lamentation, Joseph of Arimathaea and Nicodemus support Christ’s deposed body as the Virgin Mary, John the Evangelist and Mary Magdalen look on in mourning. The gold stippled background and the curved frame along the panel’s upper edge create the impression that the figures are standing in a shallow niche.
Friedländer first attributed the prototype for this Lamentation to Hugo van der Goes in 1904, and his attribution has been almost unanimously accepted ever since.2 Assuming that no autograph version had survived, Friedländer referred to a painting in Naples as one of the most faithful copies of Van der Goes’s lost work (fig. a).3 Destrée and Weale subsequently identified a fragment on canvas in Oxford’s Christ Church, which includes John, the Virgin Mary and a sliver of Christ’s body, as a remnant of the autograph painting by Van der Goes. Recent technical analysis has affirmed the autograph status of the canvas (fig. b).4 Whether the Oxford fragment constituted the sole original version by Van der Goes has more recently been questioned.5
The Amsterdam Lamentation should be considered one of the most faithful surviving copies after Van der Goes’s lost composition. It shares many salient features with the version in Naples, in which a detailed underdrawing, visible even to the naked eye, was carefully followed in the final execution of the work. Both the Amsterdam and Naples versions employ nearly the same colour scheme, facial expressions and drapery folds, and both agree in details such as the curving frame of the background niche, Nicodemus’s rose-shaped hatpin and the stream of blood running down Christ’s neck to his collarbone. The Amsterdam panel, however, is considerably larger than its counterpart and adds a streaming gilt halo around Christ’s head and stippling over the gold background.6 Several other copies abandon the niche in favour of a flat background, but are otherwise more or less comparable.7
The inner wings of the triptych include a total of eighteen donor portraits, nine male and nine female. The man kneeling at the prie-dieu in the left panel is flanked by two young men and six boys in the foreground, all presumably his sons. Behind them stands John the Evangelist, holding his chalice and making a gesture of blessing. In the right wing, the mother of the family is joined by her presumed daughters: four young women, one wearing a nun’s habit, and a row of four girls. The Virgin Mary stands holding the Christ Child behind the female donors. St Peter and Mary Magdalen stand in simple stone niches on the grisaille outer wings. The overall awkwardness of the figures on the wings – their stiffness and clumsy positioning – points to the work of a less than prominent artist. The anonymous Netherlandish painter cannot be specifically localised as either northern or southern, prior suggestions notwithstanding.8
While the original frames of the triptych could have been carved as early as the first half of the 16th century, the 1561 date on the wings suggests that they more likely belong to the second half of the century.9
The panels attached to the top and bottom of the central panel of the triptych do not, however, form part of the original object. These panels – adorned with profiles of antique gods, the coat of arms of the Guild of St Luke and an epitaph honouring the souls of Willem Gertz (d. 13 March 1534), his wife Stijntgen Dirck Claessens (d. 6 September 1531), Maria Willemsz (d. 5 April 1538) and Anna Willemsz (d. 14 September 1537) – differ in crucial respects from the triptych itself. The florid style of their carving does not accord with the simple frames around the painted panels, and their relatively poor state of conservation suggests that they have a distinct history, probably as the original frames of another memorial image. Indeed, it would be untypical for the patron who commissioned the wings of the triptych in 1561 (the year inscribed on the wings) to be erecting a memorial image to family members who had died some 20 or 30 years earlier.
As such, the epitaph has no bearing on the identification of the triptych’s donor figures. The portraits remain anonymous, and the painting’s traditional title, Gertz Memorial Triptych, must be rejected. The addition of the panels to the top and bottom of the Lamentation may well date to the 19th century, when the triptych was in the collection of the Dutch artist and self-professed admirer of medieval art Johannes Bosboom (1817-91).10
This Memorial Triptych is one of several 16th-century Netherlandish epitaphs that centre around the depiction of Christ’s deposed body and a throng of mourners. Examples include Bernard van Orley’s Haneton Triptych (c. 1521-22) and the epitaph of Philip van Hogesteyn (d. 1574) in Durham, painted by an anonymous artist.11 The inclusion of the Virgin Mary, John the Evangelist and Mary Magdalen in the composition extends the scene beyond the standard Deposition described in the gospels (Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:42-47; Luke 23:50-56; John 19:38-42) and highlights the contemplation of Christ’s suffering and the mystery of the Passion, two topical and common themes for a memorial image. It has even been suggested that the popularity of Van der Goes’s Lamentation derived from its use in funerary monuments, an intriguing but essentially speculative hypothesis.12 Yet the use of extant and well-established compositions for epitaphs was almost certainly standard practice, as it allowed local workshops to produce monuments more cheaply and efficiently.13 The 1443 Edelheer Triptych in Louvain,14 a memorial to William Edelheer (d. 1439) and his family, provides a telling counterpart to the present painting, as its central panel is a careful copy after Rogier van der Weyden’s famous Deposition.
Dendrochronology indicates that the centre panel of the Amsterdam triptych could have been painted as early as 1480, suggesting that it was – in all likelihood – created prior to the two donor wings, which date from 1561. Given the significant difference in style and quality of execution between the wings and the centre panel, they should definitely be attributed to two different artists. Perhaps whoever commissioned the triptych purchased the pre-existing Lamentation panel independently, in advance of ordering the wings. But regardless, it is evident that the frame on the wings and the centre panel (excepting the later additions discussed above) form an original unit. The surviving 16th-century hinges binding the three panels together support this conclusion.
(Marissa Bass, updated in 2010)
Literature
Friedländer 1904, p. 108; Destrée 1914, pp. 47-48; Friedländer IV, 1926, pp. 67-67, 130, no. 23f; Brussels 1935, p. 20, no. 41; Eisler 1967, pp. 65-66; Völker-Hänsel 1968, pp. 12-13; ENP IV, 1969, pp. 72-73, no. 23f; Sander 1992, p. 167, note 29; Te Rijdt 1995, p. 77; Dhanens 1998, p. 374, note 84; Dubois and Slachmuylders in coll. cat. Brussels II, 1999, p. 259
1903, p. 29, no. 339 (as Flemish school, second half 16th century, early 16th-century frame); 1934, pp. 108-09, no. 984a (Van der Goes, old copy?), 367, no. 347b; 1976, pp. 689-90, no. A 4488 (centre panel as copy after Van der Goes; wings as southern Netherlandish school, 1561)
Citation
M. Bass, 2010, 'copy after Hugo van der Goes, Memorial triptych (formerly called the Gertz memorial triptych) with the Lamentation (centre panel), nine male donor portraits with St John the Evangelist (inner left wing), nine female donor portraits with the Virgin and Child (inner right wing), St Peter (outer left wing) and St Mary Magdalen (outer right wing), after c. 1527', in J.P. Filedt Kok (ed.), Early Netherlandish Paintings, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.10380