Object data
oil on canvas
height 203 cm × width 313 cm
Hendrik van Schuylenburgh
1665
oil on canvas
height 203 cm × width 313 cm
Support The plain-weave canvas has been wax-resin lined. Cusping is present on all sides.
Preparatory layers The ground is off-white and smooth.
Underdrawing Infrared photography revealed fragmentary lines in a dry medium, also partly visible to the naked eye, at approx. 2.5 cm from the outer edges, which may have served to indicate the surface to be painted. A rather coarse, cursory underdrawing was used to generally define the landscape and the architecture.
Paint layers The landscape and architecture were executed first, and the figures, animals and trees were placed on top. The smooth and rather opaque paint surface appears to be built up in one or two layers, with little modelling and almost no indication of light and shadow. Some slight impasto is visible in the highlighted lines of the architectural elements and along the contours of the figures.
Ige Verslype, 2024
Fair. The sky and the edges of the composition are covered with discoloured overpaint. The varnish has yellowed.
? Commissioned by Pieter Sterthemius († 1676) for East India House, Middelburg, 1665;…; purchased by the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague (inv. no. 147), in or before 1881; transferred to the museum, 1885
Object number: SK-A-4282
Copyright: Public domain
Hendrik van Schuylenburgh (? - Middelburg 1689)
It is not known where or when Hendrik van Schuylenburgh was born. He is first documented in 1644 in the books of the Guild of St Luke in Middelburg. Two years later he had two pupils, Isaac van der Burcht and Steven van Batselaer, who paid their fees to the guild. In 1651 and 1652 Van Schuylenburgh was one of its governors, as he was again in 1659-60. Later records date from 1669 (noted as absent), 1671, 1685 and 1689 (after his death), and describe him as an easel painter, but it is doubtful whether he earned his livelihood from that alone.
His only extant paintings are two large canvases in the Rijksmuseum depicting Dutch possessions in Bengal.1 Some references to still lifes by ‘Schuylenburgh’ probably refer to a different person, since the rather limited artistic qualities of the Bengal scenes make it highly unlikely that Hendrik van Schuylenburgh ever created anything in that genre. A 1655 view of Middelburg has been documented, but is presumed lost, as is a picture in the 1676 inventory of the Middelburg artist and dealer Laurens Bernards. In 1647 Van Schuylenburgh designed a small series of engravings recording the discovery of Roman antiquities in Domburg, in the province of Zeeland, earlier that year.2 A manuscript relating to these prints mentions him as an easel and glass-painter, but works in the latter medium are unknown.
It has been suggested that he went to the Indies at some stage, which would explain the topographical and ethnographic accuracy of his two Bengal canvases. The period proposed for this journey is between 1661, when he is not included in the guild books for years on end, and 1665, the date on one of the Rijksmuseum pictures. His frequent absences from the guild records also allow for other possible intervals, such as 1656-58.
Erlend de Groot, 2024
References
Frederiks in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis: Verzameling van meerendeels onuitgegeven berichten en mededeelingen betreffende Nederlandsche schilders, plaatsnijders, beeldhouwers, bouwmeesters, juweliers, goud- en zilverdrijvers [enz.], II, Rotterdam 1879-80, p. 158; Bredius in ibid., VI, 1884-87, pp. 171-223; A. Bredius, Künstler-Inventare, III, The Hague 1917, pp. 1050-52, 1063; U. Thieme and F. Becker (eds.), Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, XXX, Leipzig 1936, p. 348; M. Gosselink, ‘Schilderijen van Bengaalse VOC-loges door Hendrik van Schuylenburgh’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 46 (1998), pp. 390-409; Bredius notes, RKD
This large bird’s-eye view of the factory, or trading station, of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) and its immediate surroundings at Hooghly-Chinsurah in Bengal (just north of present-day Kolkata) provides a wealth of information about the Dutch commercial activities in Asia in the seventeenth century. Hendrik van Schuylenburgh clearly delighted in depicting narrative details, but was unconvincing in his rendering of buildings, figures and nature. This is the work of a geographer rather than a professional landscape painter. For example, the composition and perspective closely resemble the drawings of other Bengal factories made by the surgeon and amateur draughtsman Nicolaus de Graaff only a few years later.3 The basis of the present picture is a rough underdrawing, still visible in many places, outlining the landscape and structures.
The central part of the composition is occupied by the factory, which includes gardens, storage buildings, offices and stables inside its gate, and has the Dutch tricolour fluttering prominently from a pole in the lower left corner. The depiction largely corresponds to contemporary plans of the trading station and its surroundings. A detailed map of 1695 in the Atlas Isaak de Graaf shows a bakery, a forge and a weaving mill within the walls which Van Schuylenburgh omitted, though it is possible that they had not yet been built in 1665 (fig. a).4 In his painting Dutchmen and Indians are mainly involved in activities related to the production and transportation of silk and other fabrics, and the maintenance of the garden. On the left is the Hooghly river, a distributary of the Ganges, with a Dutch merchant ship at anchor and another one approaching from upstream. VOC officials are being rowed ashore in an Indian proa with a drummer in the bows setting the pace for the oarsmen.
Van Schuylenburgh depicted numerous individual scenes relating to striking local events or to the Dutch presence in Bengal in the grounds around the factory. He inserted a wealth of indigenous details throughout, such as palm trees, elephants, camels and Indian oxen. Clockwise from the small boatyard to the left of the Dutch flag one sees storage tents for the transportation of bales of silk, a ‘cottage of pleasure’ surrounded by palms, and a rectangular tangh for washing horses. To the right of this pond, on the path, a trumpeter is announcing the arrival of a VOC official and his assistant, who are being borne in a palanquin and accompanied by a procession of Indians on foot and Dutchmen on horseback. They are probably being taken to the encampment on the right, which has an Indian dignitary waiting in a pavilion decked with gold-embroidered carpets. Some religious rituals are taking place: close to the brothel a crowd of Indians and three Dutchmen witness the burning of a deceased woman on a pyre near the river, and beside the two distant structures right of the path an Indian is swinging in the air as a form of self-punishment.
The factory at Hooghly-Chinsurah was the headquarters of the VOC in Bengal. It had a staff of some 80 Dutchmen and over 100 Indians, who were mainly occupied with the trade in silk, textiles, opium and saltpetre.5 In 1664 the surgeon and traveller Wouter Schouten compared it to ‘a proud castle’ rather than ‘a factory’. According to him it was ‘situated on a distinguished plaza a gunshot from the great river Ganges, so that it cannot be washed away by floods’.6 Such a deluge, which had necessitated the rebuilding of the complex, had actually taken place in 1656.7 The original station was constructed in Hooghly in the 1630s, the new one of 1656 was located a kilometre and a half to the south at Chinsurah.8 It was fully operational again by the time Van Schuylenburgh made his preparatory sketch or sketches. It has been suggested that he visited Bengal some time between 1661, when his name is missing from the guild records for a few years, and 1665, the date of the painting. However, an earlier date has to be considered as well.
The man who probably commissioned the work was Pieter Sterthemius from Middelburg who directed the VOC’s Bengal activities from 1655 to October 1658.9 The combined coat of arms of his family and that of his wife Maria Calandrini is depicted above the pedestal in the right foreground.10 It seems plausible that the artist’s stay in Bengal partly coincided with that of his patron. Sterthemius returned to the Dutch Republic in 1659. As Van Schuylenburgh’s name is also absent from the guild books from 1653 to 1659, it is quite possible that he sailed home with him.
Erlend de Groot, 2024
See Key to abbreviations, Rijksmuseum painting catalogues and Acknowledgements
M. Gosselink, ‘Schilderijen van Bengaalse VOC-loges door Hendrik van Schuylenburgh’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 46 (1998), pp. 390-409; L. Akveld and E.M. Jacobs (eds.), De kleurrijke wereld van de VOC: Nationaal Jubileumboek VOC 1602/2002, Bussum 2002, pp. 170-73; K. Zandvliet (ed.), The Dutch Encounter with Asia 1600-1950, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2002-03, pp. 189-92
1903, p. 245, no. 2184; 1934, p. 262, no. 2184; 1976, pp. 509-10, no. A 4282
Erlend de Groot, 2024, 'Hendrik van Schuylenburgh, The Dutch Factory in Hooghly-Chinsurah, Bengal, 1665', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.10186
(accessed 23 November 2024 03:12:27).