Object data
oil on canvas
support: height 106 cm × width 175.5 cm
outer size: depth 5 cm (support incl. frame)
total: weight 19 kg
Andries Beeckman (attributed to), Albert Eckhout (rejected attribution)
c. 1640 - c. 1666
oil on canvas
support: height 106 cm × width 175.5 cm
outer size: depth 5 cm (support incl. frame)
total: weight 19 kg
Support The plain-weave canvas has been glue-lined. The tacking edges have been removed, or at least very heavily trimmed, but to what extent exactly is difficult to assess due to thick overpaint. Some remains of old, possibly original tacking edges, have been flattened with the lining and incorporated in the picture plane. Cusping is very vaguely visible on all sides.
Preparatory layers The double ground extends up to the current edges of the support. The first layer is a fairly translucent dark brown consisting of very coarse white, brown and black pigment particles, and fills the interstices of the canvas. The second, beige or light brown ground contains fine to medium fine white and medium fine black and brown pigment particles.
Underdrawing Infrared reflectography revealed a finely drawn grid of 5 cm squares which covers the entire surface of the support, and was used in transferring the composition.
Paint layers The paint extends up to the current edges of the support. It was applied in a very straightforward manner, often consisting of no more than a single layer with wet-in-wet blending to create modelling. The composition was built up from the back to the front. The sky was executed first with reserves for the figures, which were then painted, followed by the background elements. Subsequently the fruits were carefully positioned, working from the middle ground towards the ground, again using reserves. Details, highlights and dark contours were added last. The numbers on the pieces of fruit, some of which are now lost or heavily retouched, as well as the inscriptions on the piece of paper, were inserted in the final stage. The figure of the woman on the left was planned to be slightly bigger at first, as revealed by infrared reflectography.
Esther van Duijn, 2022
Poor. There are several old, repaired tears. The lining of the support is very brittle and is torn along the folds of the current tacking edges at all corners. Overall there are areas of raised paint with abraded edges which reveal the ground layer. A patch or filling, now covered by thick overpaint, is visible on the far left in the sky, behind the woman’s neck. The old retouchings are discoloured. The numbers and letters on the piece of paper are very damaged. The varnish has yellowed.
…; ? collection Joan Huydecooper (1599-1661), Amsterdam, c. 1660;1…; ? sale, Mattheus van den Broucke (1620-1685, Dordrecht), Dordrecht, 17 June 1717, no. 37 (‘Indiaensche Fruytmarkt’), fl. 21.10;2…; donated by the dealer Edward Speelman, London, to the museum, 1962
Object number: SK-A-4070
Credit line: Gift of E.J. Speelman, London
Copyright: Public domain
Andries Beeckman (Hasselt 1628 - Amsterdam 1664)
Andries Beeckman was baptized on 31 August 1628 in the Dutch Reformed church of Hasselt in the province of Overijssel as the youngest son of the German merchant Hendrick Beeckman and his second wife Maria Baudartius, who were both from prominent families. The next reference to the artist comes in 24 August 1651, when a notarized document mentions him as a painter active in Deventer. It is unknown with whom he trained, but his teacher may have been Barend Avercamp, who lived in nearby Zutphen in 1640-49. Beeckman must have entered the service of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) around 1652, sailing to the East Indies soon afterwards. A drawing of a samurai indicates that he visited the island Deshima in Nagasaki,3 and on 3 January 1657 he is recorded in Batavia, where he signed a promissory note: ‘Andries Beeckman of Zutphen, soldier, presently about to sail home on the Arnhem’. A watercolour of the Dutch fortress at the Cape of Good Hope, which can be dated towards the end of 1657, proves that he was indeed aboard this ship on an arduous return voyage that took twice as long as usual.4
Beeckman must have started working out the sketches he had made in the East Indies once he was back home. Since his only known patrons were from Amsterdam it seems likely he lived there. In the early 1660s he was one of the leading specialists in Asian and African topography, ethnography, flora and fauna. For wealthy collectors he created albums with watercolours of exotic costumes, animals and plants.5 In 1662 the Amsterdam chamber of the VOC paid him 120 guilders for two pictures. One of them is now lost, the other is the View of Batavia in the Rijksmuseum.6 For a long time this was Beeckman’s only known painting, but at the beginning of this century a still life with tropical fruit and a white cockatoo surfaced on the art market.7 The artist lived on Hekelveld near the IJ in Amsterdam when he died in 1664 and was buried 9 August in the Nieuwe Kerk.
Beeckman’s paintings and drawings are clearly no demonstrations of high skills. He knew the basic rules of perspective, but did not have a sense of anatomy or composition. His figures are charming, but also naive and at times clumsy. The documentary value of his works must have been recognized early on, however, for they were copied and used by others on many occasions.
Erlend de Groot, 2022
References
A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstler-Lexikon, I, Leipzig/Vienna 1906, p. 68; Moes in U. Thieme and F. Becker (eds.), Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, III, Leipzig 1909, pp. 162-63; F. de Haan, Oud Batavia: Gedenkboek uitgegeven door het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen naar aanleiding van het driehonderdjarig bestaan der stad in 1919, III, Batavia 1923, nos. J14, L2, L3; J. de Loos-Haaxman, De landsverzameling schilderijen in Batavia: Landvoogdsportretten en compagnieschilders, Leiden 1941, pp. 64-66; Römer in Saur Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon: Die Bildenden Künstler aller Zeiten und Völker, VIII, Munich/Leipzig 1994, p. 229; L. Haks and G. Maris, Lexicon of Foreign Artists Who Visualised Indonesia (1600-1950), Utrecht 1995, p. 27; M.-O. Scalliet, ‘Une curiosité oubliée: Le Livre de dessins faits dans un voyage aux Indes par un voyageur hollandaise du marquis de Paulmy’, Archipel 54 (1997), pp. 35-62; M.-O. Scalliet, ‘Twee eeuwen Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie: Europese schilders in Oost-Indië in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw’, in K. van Brakel et al., Indië omlijst: Vier eeuwen schilderkunst in Nederlands-Indië, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Tropenmuseum) 1998-99, pp. 13-38, esp. pp. 25-28; K. Zandvliet, Mapping for Money: Maps, Plans and Topographic Paintings and their Role in Dutch Overseas Expansion during the 16th and 17th Centuries, Amsterdam 1998, pp. 224-26; E. de Groot, ‘The Earliest Eyewitness Depictions of Khoikhoi: Andries Beeckman in Africa’, Itinerario 29 (2005), pp. 17-50; E. de Groot, ‘Tussen Batavia en Amsterdam’, in M. Jonker, E. de Groot and C. de Hart (eds.), Van velerlei pluimage: Zeventiende-eeuwse waterverftekeningen van Andries Beeckman, Nijmegen 2014, pp. 9-26
The Dutch and Malay inscriptions on the piece of paper in the lower right corner identify this as a Dutch painting of subjects studied on the spot. Most of the fruit varieties are found only in Indonesia, the former Dutch East Indies, and were not exported to Europe at the time. The combination of figures from different countries suggests that the setting is most probably the very cosmopolitan Batavia, modern-day Jakarta.8 A Chinese merchant, recognizable as such from his distinctive goatee, moustache and remarkably long fingernails, is counting coins in a fruit stall set off with bamboo partitions. Standing on the left is a woman wearing a typically Javanese sarong and kebaya and holding a small cigar in one hand while placing a durian upright with the other. A second Javanese woman in the middle is lifting a small bundle of leaf wrappers out of a small Japanese lacquered casket, probably betel leaves. A boy behind her is picking a banana from the bunch hanging on the right. A striking salmon-crested cockatoo (Cacatua moluccensis) is perched on the bamboo screen at the back.
Andries Beeckman went to great lengths to depict the huge diversity of tropical fruit as faithfully as possible, but he was clearly not a professional still-life painter. The different varieties are easily distinguished, but their textures are not convincing. Laid out on the table – some with numbers matching the list on the piece of paper (the latter are given between brackets below) – are, on the far left, from top to bottom, rambutans (Nephelium lappaceum, no. 1), langsats (Lansium domesticum, no. 3) and starfruit (Averrhoa carambola, no. 2). Beside them are a partly cut pomelo (Citrus maxima, no. 4) and durians, one of them sliced (Durio, no. 5). The three small pieces of red fruit at bottom left are water or Malay apples (Syzygium aqueum or Syzygium malaccense, no. 6) or Java apples (Syzygium samarangense), and lying to their right are mangoes (Mangifera indica, no. 7) and pineapples (Ananas comosus, no. 8). Below the two pineapples in the centre are jackfruit, one halved (Artocarpus Heteropyllus, no. 9) and several small mangosteens, some opened (Garcinia mangostana, no. 10). On the right are bananas (no. 11), five coconuts and a halved one (Cocos nucifera), and at the very front cashew apples (Anacardium occidentale). The fruit cut in two in the Japanese casket is probably a sort of lime called a Calamondin orange (Citrofortunella microcarpa).
The Rijksmuseum painting is a reduced version of a canvas from an anonymous series of scenes of foreign peoples and produce that decorated the walls of Schloss Pretzsch an der Elbe in Saxony until 1828 (fig. a).9 In the nineteenth century they were removed, first to Berlin and then to Schloss Schwedt an der Oder in Brandenburg.10 They were seen there in the 1930s by Thomsen, who rather hesitantly attributed them to Albert Eckhout and dated them around the middle of the seventeenth century.11 Schwedt was completely destroyed in the closing days of the Second World War, and all that is left of the works of art are pre-war black-and-white photographs making it clear that the attribution to Eckhout is untenable.12
The connection with the canvas from Schloss Pretzsch also led to this Market Stall in Batavia being wrongly attributed to Eckhout or his circle in the past.13 It is woodenly executed, compositionally clumsy, and is not of the kind of Brazilian subject for which Eckhout is known. Minor differences between the two paintings show that they were not copied after each other but seem to share the same or a similar source. The way in which the fruit and cockatoo are depicted displays a clear resemblance to the only known still life by Andries Beeckman (fig. b), and, interestingly, one of the scenes from the series in Pretzsch castle was definitely based on watercolours by him,14 so the present canvas could also be by Beeckman or someone from his circle.
Very little is known about the picture’s provenance, although there are a few early records of an Indonesian fruit market, and since A Market Stall in Batavia is the only surviving work of that nature there is a great temptation to associate it with those early sources. There is, however, nothing that can be said for certain. Around 1660 Jan Vos wrote an ode about paintings in the collection of Joan Huydecooper, among them an ‘East Indies fruit market’: ‘Who has driven me from the north to the east? / I find myself in the market of the East Indies coast. / Here nature displays her fruit as food for life. / The sight makes my mouth desire the beautiful harvest, / Thus is my stomach now sorely overburdened. / Greedy eyes are not soon satiated’.15 It may well be that the poet was referring to the Rijksmuseum canvas.16 There is a second mention of an ‘East Indies fruit market’ a little later in the collection of burgomaster Mattheus van den Broucke of Dordrecht.17 It is far from obvious that it refers to this Market Stall in Batavia. His picture was one of a series of which the others were described as ‘One ditto, with East Indies animals and fruit’, ‘One ditto, being East Indies lodgings, ‘One ditto’, ‘Three ditto, East Indies women’ and ‘A Moorish woman’.18 It is very possible that the Rijksmuseum painting was also part of a larger ensemble of that kind.
Erlend de Groot, 2022
See Key to abbreviations, Rijksmuseum painting catalogues and Acknowledgements
Stevens and Zandvliet in K. Zandvliet (ed.), The Dutch Encounter with Asia 1600-1950, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2002-03, pp. 183-84 (as Anonymous); E. de Groot, ‘Tussen Batavia en Amsterdam’, in M. Jonker, E. de Groot and C. de Hart (eds.), Van velerlei pluimage: Zeventiende-eeuwse waterverftekeningen van Andries Beeckman, Nijmegen 2014, pp. 9-26, esp. p. 19 (as circle of Beeckman)
1976, p. 214, no. A 4070 (as attributed to Albert Eckhout)
Erlend de Groot, 2022, 'attributed to Andries Beeckman and attributed to Albert Eckhout, A Market Stall in Batavia, c. 1640 - c. 1666', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.10087
(accessed 23 November 2024 01:07:59).