Object data
oil on panel
support: height 66 cm × width 49.5 cm
Werner van den Valckert
1617
oil on panel
support: height 66 cm × width 49.5 cm
The support is a vertically grained oak panel bevelled on all sides. A thin, pinkish ground or imprimatura, or both, is followed by smooth paint layers. Some impasto was used for the highlights, particularly in the ruff.
Good.
? Commissioned by Bartholomeus Jansz van Assendelft (1585-1658), Leiden; ? his son, Jan van Assendelft (1620-68), Leiden; ? his son, Barthout Jansz van Assendelft (1659-1722), Leiden; ? or his son, Adriaan van Assendelft (1626-97), Leiden; ? his son, Jan Adriaansz van Assendelft (1659-1728), Leiden; ? his son, Adriaan van Assendelft (1691-1752), Leiden; ? his son, Barthout Adriaansz van Assendelft (1733-84), Leiden; ? the daughter of his half-sister, Maria Anna Pompe van Slingelandt (1746-1805), the wife of Hugo de Wildt, Leiden; ? by descent to Frans de Wildt (1805-69), Leiden; ? Agnes W. de Wildt (1835-1905), Leiden; her daughter, Jonkvrouw Isabella F. Mollerus (1863-1920), Leiden, wife of Baron Dirk van Asbeck; his sale, Amsterdam (F. Muller), 30 November 1920, no. 1015, to Antoon van Welie (1866-1956), The Hague; from his estate, fl. 7,500, to the museum, 19571
Object number: SK-A-3920
Copyright: Public domain
Werner van den Valckert (? The Hague c. 1580/85 - ? Amsterdam in or after 1627)
Werner Jacobsz van den Valckert was born around 1580/85, possibly in or near The Hague. He joined the Guild of St Luke there as a master-painter in approximately 1600/05, but did not produce his earliest known painting, Venus the Seductress, until around 1612.2 In 1605 he married Jannetje Cornelis van Montfoort in The Hague. He is last recorded in that city in 1612. He probably moved to Amsterdam in 1613, where a daughter of his was baptized on 10 August 1614. Like so many painters of the day, he lived in St Anthonisbreestraat, where he rented a house from the governors of the Leper-House, who were also one of his patrons.3 He is last documented as living in Amsterdam in 1627, and he must have died that year or soon afterwards, possibly elsewhere.
Van den Valckert produced both history paintings and portraits, some of them of groups. Houbraken says that he studied with Hendrick Goltzius, but there is no firm evidence for this. As a history painter, in any event, he took his inspiration from the work of Haarlem artists. His youthful work was also heavily influenced by prints of the Carracci school. It used to be assumed that he travelled to Italy and Denmark, but there are no concrete indications that he did. Van den Valckert was also a graphic artist, and was among the earliest Dutch etchers, although he soon abandoned that medium. Almost all his dated etchings were made around 1612.
Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007
References
Houbraken I, 1718, pp. 215-16; Boon in Thieme/Becker XXXIV, 1940, pp. 53-54; Van Thiel 1983d, p. 129
This signed painting dated 1617 is one of Werner van den Valckert’s earliest portraits. There are some 15 portraits that can be securely attributed to him, all of them from the period 1616-25, when he was living in Amsterdam.4 Here, with a delicate touch, he painted a lively portrait of a man looking out of a window at the viewer while holding a gold ring in his right hand and a touchstone in his left. Typical of the artist are the flesh tones, which gleam and are built up with a wealth of hues. The suggestion of depth is enhanced by the impasto of the cartwheel ruff, and above all by the stone window embrasure out of which the man is leaning.
The sitter’s identity was convincingly established recently.5 It was originally thought that this was a posthumous portrait of the Amsterdam jeweller Jan van Wely, who had been murdered in 1616, but in fact the sitter is very probably the Leiden goldsmith Bartholomeus Jansz van Assendelft (1585-1658).6 The painting’s provenance and the existence of an old copy with virtually the same provenance were the most important arguments for correcting the identification.7 In 1617, the year the portrait was painted, Van Assendelft took up his first official position in the guild of goldsmiths and silversmiths, and for many years he was assay-master and later dean. There are only a few known works by him. The ring in this portrait is an allusion to his profession, and the touchstone to his function as assayer.
There is also an explanation as to why Van Assendelft, who lived in Leiden, had his portrait painted by an Amsterdam artist. Van Assendelft was a close friend of his teacher, Frans Bastiaensz van Mieris, even after the latter settled in Amsterdam around 1616. Van Mieris must have introduced the two men. It can be deduced that Van Mieris probably knew Van den Valckert well from the fact that he acted as a witness at the baptism of Werner’s son Cornelis on 11 July 1617.8
Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 281.
Van Thiel 1983d, pp. 155, 156, 180, no. 11; Ekkart in Amsterdam 1993, pp. 594-95, no. 267; Ekkart 1999, pp. 20-25
1960, p. 311, no. 2357 A 1; 1976, p. 553, no. A 3920; 2007, no. 281
E. Korthals Altes, 2007, 'Werner van den Valckert, Portrait of a Man with Ring and Touchstone, probably Bartholomeus Jansz van Assendelft (1585-1658), 1617', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.5627
(accessed 25 November 2024 16:07:48).