Object data
oil on copper
support: height 24.5 cm × width 31 cm
outer size: depth 4.3 cm (support incl. frame)
Jacob Symonsz Pynas (attributed to)
c. 1610 - 1620
oil on copper
support: height 24.5 cm × width 31 cm
outer size: depth 4.3 cm (support incl. frame)
The copper support has buckled quite significantly. The visible ground layer is grey in colour. There is almost no visible brushmarking. The paint was thinly applied, except in the trees, where a great deal of impasto was used. Some elements of the composition, such as the figures walking along the path in the right middleground, were painted directly over the landscape.
Fair. There is some abrasion and the varnish is moderately discoloured.
...; sale, C.W.A. Buma (†) et al., The Hague (Venduhuis der Notarissen), 4 (5) November 1947 sqq., no. 69, as Anonymous, fl. 1,400, to the museum;1 on loan to the Museum Het Rembrandthuis, Amsterdam, since 2004
Object number: SK-A-3510
Copyright: Public domain
Jacob Symonsz Pynas (? Amsterdam 1592/93 - ? in or after 1650)
Although Houbraken says that he came from Haarlem, Jacob Symonsz Pynas was most likely born in 1592 or 1593 in Amsterdam, where his family had settled by 1590. He was the younger brother of Jan Pynas, who was probably also his teacher. It has been argued that Jacob was too young to have travelled with his brother to Italy around 1605. Nonetheless, the pronounced influence of Adam Elsheimer and especially Carlo Saraceni evident in his landscape paintings with small biblical or mythological staffage suggests that he did make such a trip at some point in his career. In addition to such landscapes, Jacob Pynas made history paintings with large-scale figures in the manner of Pieter Lastman. Jacob Pynas is recorded as a witness in Amsterdam in a 1619 document. By 1622 he had possibly moved to The Hague, as an innkeeper claimed that a certain Jacob Pynas owed him money in that year. A Leiden inventory of 1626 records an outstanding debt from Jacob Pynas and four of his paintings. In 1631 he is again recorded in Amsterdam. The following year, 1632, he joined the painters’ guild in Delft, where he was apparently still living in 1639. Documents from 1641 and 1643 place him in Amsterdam.
His earliest dated work is the painting Nebuchadnezzar Restored to Royal Dignity of 1616.2 His last dated work is a 1650 drawing showing Christ and Two of his Disciples on the Road to Emmaus.3 The year and place of Jacob Pynas’s death are not known. According to Houbraken, Rembrandt received instruction from Jacob Pynas for several months after his apprenticeship to Lastman.
Jonathan Bikker, 2007
References
Houbraken I, 1718, pp. 214-15, 254-55; Obreen I, 1877-78, pp. 6, 28; Bredius 1890, p. 13; Bredius 1935a, pp. 252, 256-57; Dudok van Heel/Giskes 1984, pp. 13-18, 29; Sutton in Amsterdam etc. 1987, p. 422; Schatborn 1997, pp. 3-4, 16-17, 21; A. Tümpel in Turner 1996, XXV, pp. 758-59; Dudok van Heel 2006, pp. 125-75
Upon God’s command Jacob returned to Canaan, the land of his birth, after an absence of 20 years. There he met his brother Esau and his army of 400 men. Jacob was fearful that Esau would take revenge for Jacob’s theft of his birthright and their father’s blessing, but Esau ‘embraced him, and fell on his neck, and kissed him: and they wept’ (Genesis 33:4). The meeting of Jacob and Esau was a popular theme among Dutch history painters.4 As in the majority of works showing this meeting, Jacob kneels before the helmeted Esau, who embraces him. Jacob’s wives, Lea and Rachel, are also shown kneeling before Esau, while the sheep and goats in the left foreground represent the present Jacob brought his brother.
Conceived as a precious cabinet piece, the present painting was identified merely as ‘school of Elsheimer’ until Klessmann published it for the first time with an attribution to Bartholomeus Breenbergh.5 Klessmann compared the painting to two early works by Breenbergh (one of them being another attribution), which show the unmistakable influence of Jacob Pynas.6 Such elements as the oddly proportioned figures and what he considered to be the unconvincing collection of mountains, hills and bushes prompted Klessmann to disqualify Jacob Pynas as a potential candidate. Only two years after the publication of Klessmann’s article, Oehler placed the work in a group of paintings which she attributed en bloc to Jan Pynas.7 Oehler’s group, however, is not thoroughly homogenous; one of the paintings, The Preaching of John the Baptist, in fact, has been rightly identified by Keyes as the work of Esaias van de Velde.8 The only painting in Oehler’s group that is now universally accepted as a work from Jan Pynas’s hand is the Raising of Lazarus in Aschaffenburg.9
Another painting in Oehler’s group, Landscape with Christ Handing the Keys to St Peter in Bremen, has subsequently been attributed to Jacob Pynas.10 Jacob Pynas is also most likely the artist who executed the present painting. The bushy trees with many white highlights in the foliage in the background also appear in the Bremen painting, as well as a number of other works convincingly attributed to Jacob Pynas, such as Landscape with the Repentant Magdalen in Berlin (fig. a). While this type of foliage is also found in early works by Breenbergh, such as the Finding of Moses,11 the other varieties of foliage present in the Rijksmuseum painting are only found in Jacob Pynas’s oeuvre. The clustered foliage of the central tree, as well as the fanned-out foliage of the secondary branches is very close to those in Landscape with Unidentified Old Testament Scene in Schloss Fasanerie, convincingly attributed to Jacob Pynas by Oehler.12 In both works the tree-trunks are curved and grow diagonally. Each leaf of the repoussoir tree in the present painting has been individually described, an approach which is also apparent in two other works convincingly attributed to Jacob Pynas, Landscape with the Repentant Magdalen (fig. a), and Landscape with the Meeting of Moses and Aaron in Kassel (fig. b). Most of the figure types and drapery also compare well to the latter painting. It is only the elongated figures closest to the central tree in the Rijksmuseum that do not have a ready counterpart in Jacob Pynas’s reconstructed oeuvre. This might indicate that the present painting is one of his earliest works executed in the Elsheimer mode.
Jonathan Bikker, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 251.
Klessmann 1965, p. 10 (Breenbergh?); Oehler 1967, pp. 165-66 (Jan Symonsz Pynas)
1976, p. 459, no. A 3510 (as attributed to Jan Symonsz Pynas); 2007, no. 251
J. Bikker, 2007, 'attributed to Jacob Symonsz. Pynas, The Meeting of Jacob and Esau (Genesis 33), c. 1610 - 1620', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.5109
(accessed 26 November 2024 11:28:36).