Object data
oil on panel
support: height 20.5 cm × width 17.9 cm
anonymous
? Bruges, c. 1490
oil on panel
support: height 20.5 cm × width 17.9 cm
The support is a single horizontally grained oak plank which has been planed down to a thickness of 0.4-0.8 cm. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1469. The panel could have been ready for use by 1480, but a date in or after 1494 is more likely. Forming a frame around the image, strips of approx. 0.5 cm painted in black paint were added to the top, bottom and right side (original painted surface: 19.5 x 17.4 cm). The original panel was probably cut down on all sides (about 1-2 cm on the left). The black painted edge on the right side is painted over an original ground and paint layer, which is indicated by the continuous crack pattern. The smoothly applied white ground is visible through the paint layer and extends to the edges of the original panel. There is no underdrawing visible to the naked eye nor with infrared reflectography. The paint layers were applied thinly and precisely. The very detailed execution is analogous to the work of a painter of miniatures.
Good. There are minor losses along the edges. The paint layers are covered by a thick glossy varnish, which is slightly discoloured.
…; from the dealer Nicolaas Beets, Amsterdam, fl. 4,500, to the museum, January 1921; on loan to the Mauritshuis, The Hague, 1924-97; on loan to the Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht, since 2003
Object number: SK-A-2851
Copyright: Public domain
The Old Testament relates how Noah’s descendants decided to build a tower that would reach right up to the heavens. To punish them for their pride God confused their language so that they could no longer understand each other and scattered them across the face of the earth, leaving the tower unfinished (Genesis 11:1-9). Its construction was said to have been supervised by Nimrod, the ruler of Babylon (Genesis 10:8-12), who is described as ‘a mighty hunter before the Lord’. In northern Renaissance art, which also shows the tower collapsing, its building symbolises human pride.1 The subject of the construction of the tower, which is often round and spiral-shaped, is one of the most popular in western art.2
This little panel executed like a miniature is one of the earliest painted treatments of the subject, which had a longer tradition in illuminated manuscripts. The tower in this work is still of a relatively modest size. King Nimrod, who is inspecting the work, is portrayed as a giant, and the building site itself looks like a faithful rendering of late medieval practice. In that respect it is related to the depiction of the workmen around the tower in the ‘St Barbara’ of 1437 by Jan van Eyck in Antwerp.[Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten; illustrated in ENP I, 1967, pl. 26.] Several of the figures can also be seen in Eyckian miniatures, which prompted Winkler’s theory that the Rijksmuseum painting is based on a lost early work by Jan van Eyck.3 It is unclear whether it is derived from a work from Van Eyck’s shop or was composed later with the aid of Eyckian models. Grieten has pointed out that the artist used motifs from ‘Les anciennes croniques et consquestes de Charlemaine’, which was illuminated between 1458 and 1465 in the studio of Jan de Tavernier in Oudenaarde or Tournai; the manuscript belonged to Philip of Burgundy in 1467. Grieten assumes that the miniatures and the Rijksmuseum painting have a common ancestor, and suggests that the panel may have been painted by Jan de Tavernier or one of his assistants.4 Wescher identified the painter of the panel as the Flemish miniaturist Sanders Bening (c. 1450-1519), who illuminated the ‘Brevarium Grimani’ of c. 1515-20 with the aid of his son and Gerard Horenbaut. There are also correspondences between the depiction of the tower of Babel in that breviary and this panel.5
The detailed depiction and highly refined technique point to the hand of a miniaturist, but the style is far more archaic than that of Bening’s miniatures. Although there are no clues to place the artist in a specific city, it is likely that the panel was made by someone from the world of book illuminators in one of the centres in Flanders. The dendrochronology suggests a date in the final decades of the 15th century. The scene was very probably wider on the right, because the black framing line there lies on top of the original paint layer. It is conceivable that the composition was considerably wider and was originally oblong.
JPFK
Coll. cat. The Hague 1935, p. 380, no. 784 (as Flemish, c. 1480); Wescher 1946b, p. 197 (as Sanders Bening); Winkler 1955, pp. 91-95 (as circle of Jan van Eyck); Wescher 1959, p. 135; Minkowski 1960, pp. 34, 48 (as Sanders Bening); Tóth-Ubbens in coll. cat. The Hague 1968, p. 12, no. 704 (as Bruges, c. 1450-70); Minkowski 1991, pp. 69, 77, 170, no. 170 (as Sanders Bening); Grieten 1994 (as Bruges, after 1470); Van Wegen 2005, pp. 22-23; Borchert 2008 (as copy after Jan van Eyck ?)
1921, p. 434, no. 338a (as southern Netherlands, second half 15th century); 1976, p. 696, no. A 2851 (as Bruges school, c. 1450-70)
J.P. Filedt Kok, 2010, 'anonymous, The tower of Babel, Bruges, c. 1490', in J.P. Filedt Kok (ed.), Early Netherlandish Paintings, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.9416
(accessed 10 November 2024 06:09:11).