Object data
oil on canvas
support: height 212.7 cm × width 107 cm
outer size: depth 9.5 cm (support incl. frame)
Jan Antonisz van Ravesteyn
c. 1620 - c. 1623
oil on canvas
support: height 212.7 cm × width 107 cm
outer size: depth 9.5 cm (support incl. frame)
The moderately fine, plain-weave canvas support has been lined. A strip of canvas measuring approximately 11 cm in height added at the bottom is probably not original to the composition. The colour of the ground layers of both the main and the added strips of canvas is grey, but of differing shades. An inscription recording the sitter’s name on the main strip of canvas was painted over and replaced with the present inscription painted on both the main and the added strips of canvas. Cusping is visible only on the right side of the main piece of canvas. The heavily discoloured varnish does not allow for comment on the paint layers.
Fair. The painting was mounted too taughtly on the stretcher after being lined. The paint layers were also flattened during the lining process. Discoloured passages of retouching are present along the seam and the floor has been overpainted. The varnish is very discoloured.
? Commissioned by or for Sir Horace Vere (1565-1635); first recorded at his home, Kirby Hall, Essex, in 1657;1 ? his daughter, Mary Vere, the wife of Sir Roger Townshend of Raynham; ? by descent to the 6th Marquess Townshend, Raynham Hall, Norfolk; his sale, London (Christie, Manson & Woods), 5 March 1904 sqq., no. 47, as Dutch School, £ 94 10s;...; sale, Vincent J. Robinson (†), Parnham, Bearminster, Dorset, sold on the premises (Nicholas & Hampton), 2 August 1910 sqq., no. 1458, as Dutch School, £ 70;...; from the dealer Frederik Muller, fl. 7,000, to the museum, with support from the Vereniging Rembrandt, January 1911
Object number: SK-A-2527
Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
Copyright: Public domain
Jan Anthonisz van Ravesteyn (? Culemborg c. 1572 - The Hague 1657)
Although there are no archival records to support such a supposition, it is believed that Jan Anthonisz van Ravesteyn was the son of a glass-painter, Anthonis van Ravesteyn, who is documented in Culemborg in 1593 and in The Hague in 1602. Van Ravesteyn’s date of birth is also uncertain, but it was probably around 1572. His name appears in two notarized documents from October 1597 in Delft, which has led to the belief that he was apprenticed to Van Mierevelt. However, Van Ravesteyn’s earliest known work, Portrait of Hugo de Groot at the Age of 16 of 1599,2 differs from Van Mierevelt’s early oeuvre, which, it has to be admitted does not include paintings from before 1600. In 1598 Van Ravesteyn joined the painters’ guild in The Hague, where he remained the rest of his life, marrying Anna Arentsdr van Barendrecht from Dordrecht in 1604. The wedding took place at the town hall, not in the Reformed Church, and from other, later documents it is known that the artist was a Catholic. A Van Ravesteyn was dean of the painters’ guild in The Hague in 1617, but whether this was Jan van Ravesteyn or his brother Anthonie, who was also a painter, is not known. In 1631, 1634 and 1637 he was nominated as warden of the guild, but not elected. He may perhaps have served in some capacity before 1631, but as the records of the guild’s administrators are spotty before that year, this cannot be ascertained.
Van Ravesteyn was the foremost portraitist in The Hague in the first half of the 17th century. His clientele consisted primarily of highly placed government officials and the patrician circles of The Hague and Dordrecht, the latter probably because of his wife’s ties to that town. In addition to portraits of individual burghers, Van Ravesteyn painted five civic guard pieces, some of which were quite innovative. Although there are hundreds of extant portraits by Van Ravesteyn and his workshop dating to after 1611, the number before that date is extremely small, in spite of the fact that his work was already being praised by Van Mander in 1604. His breakthrough – at least as far as commissions are concerned – seems to have come with the ambitious series of officers’ portraits begun probably for Prince Maurits in 1611.3 As his last signed and dated works are from 1641, Van Ravesteyn seems to have laid down his paintbrushes in that year. He was, however, one of the first artists invited to join the newly established Confrerie Pictura in 1656. The guild books list the names of his numerous pupils, the only outstanding one being Adriaen Hanneman (c. 1604-71), who would later become his son-in-law.
Jonathan Bikker, 2007
References
Van Mander 1604, fol. 300r; Van Gool I, 1750, pp. 15-22; Terwesten 1770, p. 9; Obreen III, 1880-81, pp. 261, 283, 285, IV, 1881-82, pp. I, 4-7, 10, 30, 59, V, 1882-83, pp. 68, 70, 72; Bredius/Moes 1892; Ekkart in The Hague 1998, pp. 230-37
In spite of the fact that the name of Sir John Burroughs is inscribed on the painting, the man in this portrait has never been satisfactorily identified until now. In the past, only the 1960 Rijksmuseum collection catalogue gave some information about him, stating that a man of this name was in Dutch service from 1605 to 1627.4 This information, however, is incorrect. It has been possible to identify the sitter unequivocally on the basis of the painting’s provenance, which is also reconstructed here for the first time. In his 1657 edition of Sir Francis Vere’s Commentaries, William Dillingham lists the name of ‘S. John Burroughs, Capt.’ together with those of 17 other officers ‘whose effigies do at once both guard and adorn Kirby-hall in Essex, where the truly religious and Honourable the Lady Vere doth still survive’.5 Lady Vere was the wife of Sir Horace Vere (1565-1635), one of England’s most famous soldiers and a brother of Sir Francis Vere.6 It seems safe to assume that the 18 full-length portraits at Kirby Hall were commissioned either by or for Sir Horace. After the death of his wife, they passed to his daughter Mary, who married Sir Roger Townshend of Raynham. The portraits remained with the Townshend family until they were sold at auction in 1904 by the 6th Marquess Townshend. The Portrait of Sir John Burroughs found its way into the museum’s collection seven years later. Two other portraits in the series, those of Sir Thomas Gates (fig. a) and Sir Robert Carey (fig. b) were sold at Sotheby’s in 1971.7 Both portraits carry inscriptions with the sitters’ names in exactly the same lettering and position as that on the Rijksmuseum’s portrait.
Given the portrait’s provenance, the sitter must be the Sir John Burroughs who accompanied Horace Vere to the Palatinate in 1620.8 Born in 1587, John Burroughs was a son of Richard Burroughs and Amy Dillington of Stow, near Lincoln.9 As sergeant-major, he was in charge of a company of 150 foot in Horace Vere’s regiment of 2,250 men who were dispatched to the Palatinate in 1620 in order to help Frederick V regain the Bohemian throne. On 22 July 1620, the English expeditionary forces arrived in Dordrecht, remaining in the United Provinces for two weeks before continuing on to Germany. After the other English troops had long returned home, Burroughs continued to resist the Spanish Siege of Frankenthal, of which town he was governor. He finally surrendered on 14 April 1623 after receiving orders from home. On 17 May 1623, Burroughs was back in London, where he was knighted by James I for his brave defence of Frankenthal.10 As a colonel of a foot regiment, Burroughs took part in the attack on Cadiz in 1625. Two years later, he was second-in-command of the 6,000 English soldiers who were dispatched to aid the French Huguenots at La Rochelle. Colonel Burroughs was shot and killed on the Isle of Rhé, near La Rochelle, on 20 September 1627. He was buried with military honours in Westminster Abbey on 23 October.
The attribution of John Burroughs’s portrait to Van Ravesteyn made in previous Rijksmuseum collection catalogues is justified. The soft modelling of the sitter’s face and fluffy appearance of his hair are characteristic features of Van Ravesteyn’s style. Burroughs likely sat for Van Ravesteyn in the summer of 1620, when the English expedition he was part of went through the United Provinces on its way to the Palatinate. Another possibility is that he was portrayed when he passed through the northern Netherlands on his way back to England in 1623. Given the type of ruff he is shown wearing, either date is feasible.
Jonathan Bikker, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 254.
1934, p. 235, no. 1975A; 1960, p. 253, no. 1978 A 5; 1976, p. 464, no. A 2527; 2007, no. 254
J. Bikker, 2007, 'Jan Antonisz. van Ravesteyn, Portrait of Sir John Burroughs (1587-1627), c. 1620 - c. 1623', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.5203
(accessed 29 December 2024 04:01:59).