Object data
oil on canvas
support: height 114 cm × width 84.5 cm × thickness 4 cm (support incl. backboard)
Anthony van Dyck (after)
c. 1700
oil on canvas
support: height 114 cm × width 84.5 cm × thickness 4 cm (support incl. backboard)
…; sale, Baronesse Douairière Röell, née Cornelia Catharina Hodshon (1794-1871), widow of Willem Baron Röell, heer van Hazershoude (1783-1841), Amsterdam (C.F. Roos et al.), 25 April 1872, no. 7 (‘Anthonij van Dyck […] De Jonge Toonzetter (Luberti organist te Groningen) […] hoog 112 breed 81 centimetres Doek’), bought in at fl. 19,800;1 from her sons Willem (1821-96) and Isaac (1822-1913), to the City of Amsterdam; on loan to the museum, since 30 June 18852
Object number: SK-C-312
Credit line: On loan from the City of Amsterdam
Copyright: Public domain
Anthony van Dyck (Antwerp 1599 - London 1641)
Anthony van Dyck was baptized in the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk, Antwerp, on 22 March 1599, the seventh child of a prosperous haberdasher. He died on 9 December 1641 in Blackfriars, London, and was buried two days later in Saint Paul’s Cathedral. By then he was internationally famous, and had to his credit an oeuvre of well over seven hundred paintings, consisting mostly in portraits, but also some highly esteemed sacred and profane figure subjects. He had outlived Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), who had greatly influenced him in his youth, by only some eighteen months, but he was to prove the more widely influential.
Enrolled as a pupil of Hendrik van Balen (1574/1575-1632) in 1609, he became a master in the Antwerp guild of St Luke nine years later before he was eighteen and a week before he received his majority – an event perhaps connected with this father’s financial difficulties which had begun in 1615 and ended with the sale of the family house in 1620, having caused strife in the family. In the meantime, Van Dyck had earlier entered Rubens’s studio, and had perhaps already operated unofficially as an artist working from a house in Antwerp called Den Dom van Ceulen. He was the only one of Rubens’s assistants to be named in the contract for the paintings for the Antwerp Jesuit Church signed on 22 March 1620.
There is no contemporary archival evidence for the existence of a studio functioning for Van Dyck before he left Antwerp for London and Rome. However, statements given in a lawsuit in Antwerp in 1660/1661 and the number of contemporary versions of some of Van Dyck’s works of that time would indicate at the least that there was a group of artists working in Van Dyck’s milieu, however informally.3
Van Dyck left Antwerp for London in October 1620; the purpose of his short visit – he was granted permission to leave at the end of the following February – is not known, but he received a payment from King James I (1566-1625) and was expected to return in eight months. He was recorded soon afterwards as living in Rome in the same house as George Gage (c. 1582-1632), an ‘Anglo-Catholic’ employed by the British crown to advance negotiations for the prince of Wales’s ‘Spanish match’ at the papal court.4
In Italy, Van Dyck was active in Rome, Venice, Genoa and Palermo.5 He re-established himself in 1627 in Antwerp, and was appointed court painter to the governor of the Spanish Netherlands, the Archduchess Isabella (1566-1633); his practice extended to The Hague whence he was summoned on two occasions.
By the summer of 1632, Van Dyck had settled in London; he was knighted by King Charles I (1600-1649) and then granted an annual pension as a retainer. But in the spring of 1634, he was in Antwerp and by the end of the year he was living in Brussels. By March 1635 he had returned to London and was established in a studio, specially converted by the architect Inigo Jones (1573-1652), on the Thames at Blackfriars. In great demand, not only by the king as a portrait painter, Van Dyck mixed with members of the court and married in 1640 Mary Ruthven, who was of a Scots noble family. In the autumn of 1640 he was in Antwerp, and early in 1641 briefly in Paris whence he returned hoping to gain the patronage of King Louis XIII (1601-1643) and Cardinal Richelieu (1585-1642). There in November, he wrote that he was very unwell; back in London with his wife for her lying-in, he died shortly after the birth of his daughter, Justiniana.
References
S.J. Barnes, N. de Poorter, O. Millar and H. Vey, Anthony van Dyck: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings, New Haven (Conn.)/London 2004, pp. 1-12
The identity of the sitter is established by Pieter de Jode II’s (1606-1674) engraving of a variant of this portrait for Anthony van Dyck’s Iconography.6 There Hendrik Liberti (c. 1600-1669) is described as organist of the Antwerp cathedral to which post he was appointed on 17 March 1628; a native of Groningen, he was early a chorister in the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk. A composer, primarily of vocal music, and virtuoso performer, he turned down an offer in 1635 to become court organist in Brussels. He was then described as ‘a very expert master, first musician and organist in the Netherlands’.7
The age of the Rijksmuseum portrait is difficult to estimate because of the old discoloured varnish; it connects with the possibly prime version which was owned by King Charles I of Great Britain (1600-1649) by 1639-40, and which is now in the collection of the Phoebus Foundation on loan to the Rubenshuis, Antwerp.8 Studio versions are in the Alte Pinakothek, Munich, and the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid.9 The present work is likely to be somewhat later, particularly as the base of the column resting on the plinth is misunderstood. The painting engraved by De Jode differs in the placement of the hand and score on the plinth; it must have been made after another version then in Antwerp, where De Jode was active.
The sitter wears a three-looped gold chain; it was presumably awarded as a mark of the esteem following his prestigious appointment. He holds a music score for voices showing two bars and lyrics; the score on the Phoebus Foundation portrait was no longer legible (at the time of its recent public sale). The score differs from that shown in De Jode’s print but looks to be the same as that on the version in Madrid. With head raised and alert eyes, Liberti is perhaps shown about to sing.
Gregory Martin, 2022
Vey in S.J. Barnes, N. de Poorter, O. Millar and H. Vey, Anthony van Dyck: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings, New Haven (Conn.)/London 2004, under no. III.100
1887, p. 40, no. 314 (as a copy of Van Dyck); 1903-21, p. 91, no. 861; 1976, p. 210, no. C 312
G. Martin, 2022, 'after Anthony van Dyck, Portrait of Hendrik Liberti (c. 1600-c. 1669), c. 1700', in Flemish Paintings in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.8292
(accessed 23 November 2024 23:48:21).