Object data
oil on canvas
support: height 190 cm × width 268 cm
Hendrick Cornelisz Vroom
in or after 1629
oil on canvas
support: height 190 cm × width 268 cm
The support consists of two strips of canvas. The canvas has been lined. The tacking edges have not been preserved. Slight cusping is visible at the left, top and right. The impression left by two diagonal struts of the first strainer and the absence of any impression of the strainer itself may indicate that the painting was larger all round, and even, in theory, up to 47 cm higher. On the evidence of the cusping, though, it is more likely that it was approximately 10 cm higher. The ground is greyish. The painting was built up in thin layers with no appreciable texture.
Fair. The painting is abraded and there is an old area of damage, probably a tear, in the bottom left corner. The retouchings and varnish are discoloured.
Commissioned by the Haarlem authorities for the town hall, 1629;1 ceded to the State and transferred to the museum, 18042
Object number: SK-A-602
Copyright: Public domain
Hendrick Cornelisz Vroom (Haarlem c. 1566 - Haarlem 1640)
According to Karel van Mander in his lengthy account of Hendrick Vroom’s life, the artist was born in Haarlem in 1566. He began his career as a decorator of delftware, his father’s craft. A document of 1634 reveals that he learned ‘art’ in Delft. He travelled to Spain and Italy in his youth, remaining away from home for more than five years. While he was in Rome he met Paulus Bril, who encouraged him to start painting and gave him lessons. Between around 1585 and 1587 he was in the service of Cardinal Ferdinando de’ Medici. His journey back to the Dutch Republic took him through Venice, Milan, Turin, Lyon, Paris and Rouen.
Back in Haarlem he married Joosgen Cornelisdr Gans, but he was soon travelling again. Around 1591 he went to Gdansk, where his uncle Frederick Henricksz was city architect. According to Van Mander he made an altarpiece there (now probably lost), and his uncle taught him the rules of perspective. He then set off for Spain again but was shipwrecked and returned to his native Haarlem in 1592, where he remained for the rest of his life.
From the moment he got back, Vroom started making tapestry designs and painting marines. A series of ten tapestry designs traced the battle between the English and the Spanish Armada.3 Another major series of tapestries he designed is preserved in Middelburg Abbey. Vroom made his earliest known dated painting in 1599, The Return to Amsterdam of the Second Expedition to the East Indies, 19 July 1599 (SK-A-2858). His earlier paintings are lost.
Van Mander describes and explains the origins of the new genre of marine painting as follows. ‘Returned home he [Vroom] continued, on the advice of the painters there, making pieces with ships, and gradually he got better and better at making them. And since there is much sea-faring in Holland, the public also started to take great pleasure in these little ships.’
Vroom painted historical naval battles, ships’ portraits and views of maritime towns like Hoorn, Amsterdam and Vlissingen. His highly detailed depictions soon brought him fame, enabling him to ask very high prices for them. Van Mander also says that he was highly productive, with the result that he earned a fortune from his work.
Vroom’s two sons, Cornelis (c. 1590/91-1661) and Frederik (c. 1600-67), both became painters. According to Houbraken, Jan Porcellis (before c. 1584-1632) was apprenticed to Hendrick Vroom. Given the similarities between Vroom’s work and that of Cornelis Claesz van Wieringen (before 1577-1633), it is assumed that he too was a pupil of Vroom’s.
Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007
References
Van Mander 1604, fols. 287r-88v; Ampzing 1621, [p. 33]; Schrevelius 1648, pp. 386-89; Von Sandrart 1675 (1925), pp. 146-47; Houbraken I, 1718, p. 213; Von Wurzbach II, 1910, pp. 833-34; Bredius II, 1916, pp. 659-61, 667-79, VII, 1921, p. 274; Thieme/Becker XXXIV, 1940, pp. 581-82; Russell 1983, pp. 91-140, 204-11; Ruurs in Miedema II, 1995, pp. 226-38; Giltaij in Rotterdam-Berlin 1996, p. 79; Van Thiel-Stroman 2006, pp. 332-37
This monumental canvas shows the battle between the Sea Beggars and the Spanish that took place on the Haarlemmermeer in May 1573, which was lost by the rebels. It was a turning-point in the Siege of Haarlem, for soon afterwards the town fell to the Spanish. Amsterdam played an unusual part by fighting on Spain’s side.4 The Amsterdam and Spanish ships are sailing from right to left in the painting, with the Sea Beggars heading towards them from the south. The ships were relatively small, because the battle was fought on a large inland lake. The Haarlem skyline is seen from the east in the background, together with the river Spaarne at the point where it joined the lake. Haarlem Woods are on fire on the left.
Vroom’s painting is exceptional in that defeats were almost never depicted. The reason that this one was lies in the fact that the Siege of Haarlem so weakened the Spanish that it later came to be seen as a portent of the victory in Alkmaar (1573), and thus as a heroic moment in the Dutch Revolt. The bravery of the citizens of Haarlem was widely lauded, above all in Samuel Ampzing’s Beschryvinge ende lof der stad Haerlem of 1628.5
In 1629, more than 50 years after the battle, Vroom was commissioned to commemorate it by the Haarlem authorities, who wanted a painting of the event for the council chamber in the new wing of the town hall. Vroom was paid 750 pounds for his work.6 Also hanging in the room were two tapestries after designs by Cornelis van Wieringen and Pieter de Grebber depicting The Capture of Damietta and The Augmentation of the Coat of Arms respectively, as well as a painting of the latter subject by De Grebber – both of them subjects glorifying the heroic deeds of Haarlem citizens in the 13th century.7
Paintings of maritime incidents were often made long after the event, which is an important consideration when assessing the reliability of the depiction. The viewers of such works would not have been bothered about the accuracy of the scene, but would have felt edified by the heroic courage or the sufferings of their fellow citizens.8
Vroom shows the Battle of the Haarlemmermeer in bird’s-eye view, with a cartographic panorama on the high horizon, and the composition is a little reminiscent of his tapestry designs.9
An anonymous drawing in the Haarlem City Archives somewhat resembles the view of the city in the background of this painting.10 Keyes suggested that it was a preliminary study made by one of Vroom’s assistants, but that is not very likely in view of the many discrepancies. The motif may have been based on an engraving after Maarten van Heemskerck.11
Keyes assigns the painting, the date of which is no longer legible, to Vroom’s ‘late style’, but on grounds that are rather unclear.12 It was probably completed in 1629, not long after the commission was awarded. The high horizon, though, would tend to suggest that it is an early work. The difficulty here is the lack of any clear development in Vroom’s style down the years.
Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 336.
Temminck 1973, pp. 266-73; Bol 1973, p. 24; Keyes 1975, I, p. 128; Russell 1983, p. 189; Biesboer 1983, p. 50; Van Bueren 1993, p. 256; Van der Ree-Scholtens 1995, p. 52; Haarlem 1995, pp. 38-39
1903, p. 292, no. 2607; 1934, p. 311, no. 2607; 1960, p. 336, no. 2607; 1976, p. 592, no. A 602; 2007, no. 336
E. Korthals Altes, 2007, 'Hendrik Cornelisz. Vroom, Battle between Dutch and Spanish Ships on the Haarlemmermeer, 26 May 1573, in or after 1629', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.6504
(accessed 22 November 2024 19:23:21).