Object data
oil on panel
support: height 29.8 cm × width 24 cm × thickness 1.5 cm
outer size: depth 6.5 cm (support incl. frame)
Wybrand de Geest
1632
oil on panel
support: height 29.8 cm × width 24 cm × thickness 1.5 cm
outer size: depth 6.5 cm (support incl. frame)
The support consists of a single oak plank with a vertical grain bevelled on all sides. The panel is thicker on the right, which explains why only part of the bevel on the left is present. The ground layer is light-coloured and thin. The painting was swiftly executed, with visible brushstrokes in the hair, armour and sash. The background was painted translucently with a broad brush. The inscription VAN NASSOU was added at a later date, since it is executed in an ochre-coloured paint and in a different hand from GRAEF. WILLEM. FREDERICK., which was written in paint containing gold particles.
Fair. The painting is somewhat abraded, and there are several discoloured areas of retouching.
? Commissioned by or for Hendrik Casimir I (1612-40), Stadholder of Friesland; ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 12-14 and 27 September 1731, furniture attic (‘Veertig kleine portraitjes gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);1 ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 1764, furniture attic (‘Tweeënveertig kleine portraitjes, gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);2...; first recorded in the museum in 1800/013
Object number: SK-A-530
Copyright: Public domain
The Leeuwarden Series
In its present state the Leeuwarden Series consists of 41 small, bust-length portraits, predominantly of members of the Nassau family, and Dutch and foreign military leaders who participated in the Eighty Years’ War. Three other paintings that belonged to the series are now missing (Portrait of Willem I, Prince of Orange (SK-A-516), Portrait of a Man (SK-A-563) and Portrait of a Man (SK-A-565), see entries below), while another eight that have always been included in the series in past Rijksmuseum collection catalogues and the literature on the series clearly form a separate group and have been renamed the Katzenelnbogen Series in this catalogue.4 The majority of the portraits were executed by Van Ravesteyn’s studio. The next largest group comprises works produced by Van Mierevelt’s workshop. Wybrand de Geest, himself, is responsible for two of the paintings, the portraits of Hendrik Casimir I (SK-A-533) and Willem Frederik (SK-A-530), while two others in the series were probably executed by his studio (Portrait of Adolf, Count of Nassau (SK-A-522); Portrait of Hendrik, Count of Nassau (SK-A-524)). The series also includes three copies after portraits by Gerard van Honthorst (Portrait of Frederik Hendrik (SK-A-519); Portrait of Willem II (SK-A-520); Portrait of Willem III (SK-A-521)) and three works that clearly form a group but whose author will have to remain anonymous for the time being (Portrait of an Unknown Count or Officer (SK-A-528); Portrait of Lodewijk, Count of Nassau (SK-A-523); Portrait of François de la Noue (SK-A-551)). Finally, there is one portrait executed by Moreelse’s studio (Portrait of Anthonis van Utenhove (SK-A-566)).
All of the portraits are inscribed in gold-coloured lettering recording the sitters’ names and, for some of the Nassau family members, the date and place of their death and their age when they died. Uniquely, the Portrait of Willem III (SK-A-521) is inscribed with the date and place of his birth. An explanation for the fact that four different types of lettering were used in these inscriptions has not been found, but it is possible to date the inscriptions to before 1671. In that year Johannes Tideman copied some of the portraits in the present series for a series of Nassau portraits for the Statenzaal of the Provinciehuis in Groningen. Not only did Tideman faithfully replicate the portraits, he also copied the inscriptions. The original inscriptions, therefore, must have been painted before 1671. In addition to the gold-coloured inscriptions, eight of the portraits bear inscriptions in black paint, and one of them in red paint. Three of these inscriptions record the name ‘M. Ravestein’ and three others the name ‘M. Mirevelt’. While they have been taken for signatures in the past, this is certainly not the case, as the artists’ names are misspelled, and one of the portraits, of Jan the Younger (SK-A-534), carries Van Mierevelt’s name, but is more likely the product of Van Ravesteyn’s studio. The red inscription on the Portrait of Anthonis van Utenhove (SK-A-556) reads ‘PM’, the monogram of Paulus Moreelse, and is dated 1619. De Geest’s 1632 portraits of Hendrik Casimir I (SK-A-533) and Willem Frederik (SK-A-530) are the only ones in the series that can be truly said to be signed. Dates are inscribed on two other portraits in the series; that of Albert, Count of Nassau-Dillenburg (SK-A-532) bears the date 1622, and that of Willem Lodewijk, 1609 (SK-A-525). The latter is therefore the earliest dated work in the series, and 1609 could very well be the year the series was begun. The year 1609 has been used as a terminus post quem for the portraits that do not bear dates and could not be dated by other means, such as dendrochronology or the date of a prototype.
The series has traditionally been called ‘The Honselaarsdijk Series’ in reference to the supposed provenance of the portraits from Frederik Hendrik’s country house south-west of The Hague, which the stadholder had rebuilt beginning in 1621. Nothing is known about how the portraits came into the museum’s collection, but they are apparently already included on the ground-plan of the Nationale Konst-Gallery drawn up by Jan Gerard Waldorp in the winter of 1800/01 as three groups of ‘14 portraits of illustrious persons’ (‘14 Pourtretten van illustre Perzoonen’).5 In the 1801 manuscript catalogue composed by Cornelis Sebille Roos, the portraits are recorded individually according to their gold-lettered inscriptions.6 Their supposed provenance from the Honselaarsdijk estate is first recorded in the collection catalogue of 1858.7 A gallery of famous men – and a few women – which included 88 small bust-length portraits of Dutch and foreign princes, kings, artists, scholars and military officers, did exist at Honselaarsdijk, but only in a very few cases do the names correspond with the sitters in the present series.8 On the other hand, as Drossaers and Lunsingh Scheurleer were able to demonstrate in 1974, many of the portraits correspond to those listed under the heading ‘kleine borststukken’ (small bust-length pieces) in a 16 August 1633 inventory of the possessions of the Frisian Stadholder’s Court in Leeuwarden.9
Putting the eight paintings belonging to the Katzenelnbogen Series aside, as has been done here for the first time, makes the correspondence between the present series and the portraits listed in the 1633 inventory even more apparent than in the Drossaers and Lunsingh Scheurleer reconstruction. Of the 42 portraits listed in the 1633 inventory, only five cannot be accounted for among the existing paintings in the series. Assuming that Drossaers and Lunsingh Scheurleer are correct in identifying one of these portraits, that of Asinge Entens, as the now lost Portrait of a Man, c. 1609-33 (SK-A-563), only four of the paintings in the inventory do not correspond to the series that has come down to us. Among the copies made by Tideman is a Portrait of William the Rich (1487-1559),10 the father of, among others, William the Silent (the now lost SK-A-516), Jan the Elder,11 Lodewijk (SK-A-523), Adolf (SK-A-522) and Hendrik (SK-A-524), all of whom are represented in the Leeuwarden Series. The Portrait of Willem the Rich that Tideman copied is no longer traceable, but must have been part of the series and can be identified with the portrait recorded in the 1633 inventory as ‘Graeff Willem van Nassau’.12 So only three of the portraits listed in the 1633 inventory cannot be accounted for. These portraits showed John Ogle (1569-1640),13 Jacob van Wassenaar (1574-1623), Lord of Obdam,14 and Hendrich, Prince of Bohemia.15 Not only is the correspondence between the present series and that listed in the 1633 inventory striking, but because of Groningen’s proximity to Leeuwarden, the copies made by Tideman for the former town provides further evidence for this provenance.
A number of the portraits in the present series, such as the three painted in Gerard van Honthorst’s style showing Frederik Hendrik (SK-A-519), Willem II (SK-A-520), and Willem III (SK-A-521), were obviously added to the series after the 1633 inventory; Willem III was born 17 years after the inventory was drawn up, and the prototypes for the portraits of Frederik Hendrik and Willem II are from 1647. A portrait showing Frederik Hendrik, listed as ‘Henrick, prins van Orangien’ in the inventory, was already part of the series in 1633. The patron who commissioned the portraits of Willem II and Willem III perhaps decided to add a more up-to-date portrait of Frederik Hendrik as well. Whether this was the case or not, the Portrait of Willem III, which for reasons given in the entry on that painting can be dated to around 1653, was the last one added to the series. The fact that Wybrand de Geest’s portraits of Hendrik Casimir I (SK-A-533) and Willem Frederik (SK-A-530) are not listed in the inventory is puzzling, as the latter painting is dated 1632. Were these portraits, perhaps, only delivered after the inventory of the series had been completed? The portraits of Adolf (1540-68), Count of Nassau (SK-A-522) and Hendrik (1550-74), Count of Nassau (SK-A-524) also pose a problem with regard to the inventory. As both likenesses were copied from a portrait showing the four brothers of William the Silent by De Geest, one assumes they were executed at the same time. Portraits of Hendrik, Count of Nassau (‘Henrick graeff van Nassau’),16 and Adolf, Count of Nassau (‘Graeff Adolff van Nassau’),17 are listed in the inventory, the problem being that there are two Adolfs in the series as we now know it. The other Adolf in the series is Adolf (1586-1608), Count of Nassau-Siegen (SK-A-535). Although it cannot be determined from the sequence of the portraits in the inventory which Adolf was in the series by 1633, it seems likely that it was the younger of the two. The prototype for the portrait of the younger Adolf can be dated to between about 1606 and 1608, the year of his death, and the rest of the generation of Nassaus to which he belonged were already present in the series in 1633. On the other hand, De Geest’s Group Portrait of the Four Brothers of William I, the prototype for the portraits of the older Adolf and for that of Hendrik is from around 1630.18 The portraits of Adolf and Hendrik by De Geest’s studio were, perhaps, executed after 1633, and, as seems to be the case with the Portrait of Frederik Hendrik, the Portrait of Hendrik, Count of Nassau perhaps came to replace an existing portrait of that sitter.
Unfortunately, there is no mention of the series in later inventories of the Frisian Stadholder’s Court that specifically records the names of the sitters. The series does not appear at all in the 1681 inventory, nor in those of 1688 and 1694, but the one drawn up in 1731 mentions ‘Forty small portraits from a mantelpiece’ (‘Veertig kleine portraitjes gekomen uit een schoorsteen’) in the furniture attic.19 The 1764 inventory repeats this information almost verbatim, except that the number of portraits given there is forty-two, and eight others are mentioned as being elsewhere in the building.20 In order to account for the supposed provenance of the series from the Honselaarsdijk estate, which, as mentioned above, was claimed for the first time in the 1858 collection catalogue, it has been suggested that the portraits were moved from Leeuwarden at some point to fill out a portrait series there.21 However, given the fact that the Honselaarsdijk provenance was recorded more than half a century after the paintings entered the museum, such a hypothesis has little basis. It was, perhaps, simply the knowledge that a portrait gallery existed at Honselaarsdijk that led to the invention of this provenance in the 1858 collection catalogue.
Given its likely Leeuwarden provenance and the fact that the earliest dated portrait is from 1609, the present series was probably initiated by Willem Lodewijk, Stadholder of Friesland, between 1584 and his death in 1620. Significantly, his portrait is one of the few dated works, and that date is the earliest in the series. Some of the portraits would have been added to the series during the stadholdership of Willem Lodewijk’s brother Ernst Casimir (1620-32) and those of Ernst Casimir’s sons Hendrik Casimir (1632-40) and Willem Frederik (1640-64). The latter must have been responsible for expanding the series to include the new portrait of Frederik Hendrik (SK-A-519), and those of Willem II (SK-A-520) and Willem III (SK-A-521). The inclusion of the portrait of Willem II, and especially of Willem III as a child, was not wholly in keeping with the overriding nature of the series, which had been to show portraits of members of the Nassau family and other military figures who participated in the Eighty Years’ War. The question arises whether the series had not already undergone athematic change prior to this. Originally the series may have only included portraits of military officers from the Nassau family, the decision to include portraits of other officers coming later. What may have prompted this thematic change was the example of the series of portraits of military officers, none of whom are Nassaus, begun by Van Ravesteyn in 1611 very probably for Prince Maurits, and now in the collection of the Mauritshuis.22 The prototypes for a number of the officer portraits in the Leeuwarden Series are from after 1611, and the prototype that most likely served the painter of Daniel de Hertaing’s portrait (SK-A-564) is one of the paintings in the 1611 Mauritshuis series. The Leeuwarden Series may have begun life in 1609 with a few portraits of members of the Nassau family who fought in the Eighty Years’ War, but was expanded some time after 1611 to include other military officers in the service of the States army.
Jonathan Bikker, 2007
The Leeuwarden Series, missing works
Portrait of Willem I (1533-84), Prince of Orange, c. 1609-33 (SK-A-516)
Workshop of Michiel Jansz van Mierevelt
Oil on panel, 30 x 25 cm
INSCRIPTIONS
Inscribed, top: Prins Wilhelm van Orangien, de Oude, Ætatis 52 tot Delft vermoort 1584 (Prince William of Orange, the Elder, murdered in Delft in 1584 aged 52)
PROVENANCE
? Commissioned by or for Willem Lodewijk (1560-1620), Stadholder of Friesland; inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 16 August 1633, furniture room (‘Willem prins van Orangien’);23 ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 12-14 and 27 September 1731, furniture attic (‘Veertig kleine portraitjes gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);24 ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 1764, furniture attic, (‘Tweeënveertig kleine portraitjes, gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);25 ...; first recorded in the museum in 1800/0126
ENTRY
For his biography see the entry on the Portrait of Willem I by Van Mierevelt’s workshop.27 The painting is missing, and is now only known from an old reproduction. The painting by Van Mierevelt that served as the prototype, is also lost.28 The countless studio replicas after it, however, confirm that it was indeed the prototype for the bust-length portrait in the Leeuwarden Series. A copy of the present portrait was executed by Johannes Tideman for the Statenzaal of the Provinciehuis in Groningen in 1671.29
LITERATURE
Van Beresteyn 1933, p. 10, no. 11 (as copy by Van Ravesteyn after Van Mierevelt)
COLLECTION CATALOGUES
1801, p. 48, no. 35/1 (‘Prins Willem I’; without attribution); 1809, p. 92, no. 420 (without attribution); 1853, p. 36, no. 402 (as Anonymous; collective number for the Leeuwarden and Katzenelnbogen series; fl. 2,000); 1858, p. 181, no. 402a (as 17th-century Dutch School); 1880, p. 365, no. 431a (as Anonymous); 1887, p. 112, no. 941 (as copy by Van Ravesteyn after Van Mierevelt); 1903, p. 220, no. 1979 (as copy by Van Ravesteyn after Van Mierevelt); 1934, p. 236, no. 1979 (as copy by Van Ravesteyn after Van Mierevelt); 1976, p. 699, no. A 516; 2007, no. 352
Portrait of a Man, c. 1609-33 (SK-A-563)
Anonymous
Oil on panel, 30 x 25 cm
PROVENANCE
? Commissioned by or for Willem Lodewijk (1560-1620), Stadholder of Friesland; ? inventory Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 16 August 1633, furniture room (‘Den oversten Aessinga’);30 ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 12-14 and 27 September 1731, furniture attic (‘Veertig kleine portraitjes gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);31 ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 1764, furniture attic (‘Tweeënveertig kleine portraitjes, gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’); 32 ...; first recorded in the museum in 1800/0133
ENTRY
This portrait is missing, and is not known from photographs. Drossaers and Lunsingh Scheurleer identified it as the Portrait of Asinge Entens listed in the 1633 Leeuwarden inventory.34 The Frisian nobleman Entens first fought on the side of the Spanish against the Dutch rebels. After his company was defeated in 1568 by his brother Bartold, fighting on the side of the rebels, he was taken prisoner. He then changed sides and fought under Lodewijk (1538-74), Count of Nassau. The dates of his birth and death are not known, but it seems likely that he was killed in 1570 during an unsuccessful attack on the Abbey of Warffum.35
COLLECTION CATALOGUES
1853, p. 36, no. 402 (collective number for the Leeuwarden and Katzenelnbogen series; fl. 2,000); 1903, ? p. 18, no. 185; 1934, ? p. 16, no. 185; 1976, p. 706, no. A 563; 2007, no. 394
Portrait of a Man, c. 1633-49 (SK-A-565)
Anonymous
Oil on panel, 30 x 25 cm
PROVENANCE
...; ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 12-14 and 27 September 1731, furniture attic (‘Veertig kleine portraitjes gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);36...; ? inventory, Frisian Stadholder’s Court, Leeuwarden, 1764, furniture attic (‘Tweeënveertig kleine portraitjes, gekomen uit een schoorsteen.’);37...; first recorded in the museum in 1800/0138
This portrait is missing and is not known from photographs. According to Drossaers and Lunsingh Scheurleer, who did not identify the sitter, it was a later addition to the Leeuwarden Series.39
COLLECTION CATALOGUES
1903, p. 22, no. 249; 1976, p. 706, no. A 565; 2007, no. 395
These entries were published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, nos. 352, 394 and 395.
Wybrand de Geest (Leeuwarden c. 1592 - Leeuwarden 1661/65)
Wybrand de Geest was probably born in Leeuwarden on 16 August 1592, going by the inscription on the back of his self-portrait (SK-A-1780) in the Rijksmuseum. It is likely that he received his initial training from his father, Simon Juckes de Geest, a glasspainter. It emerges from the contributions to his album amicorum that he trained with Abraham Bloemaert in Utrecht in 1613-14, and the same source shows that he travelled for seven years after completing his apprenticeship, and visited Paris and Aix-en-Provence. He spent most of his time in Rome, however, where he stayed from 1616. In the Schildersbent (Band of Painters) there he was given the nickname ‘The Frisian Eagle’, according to Houbraken because of his ‘high flight in art’. He was still in Rome in 1620, but was back in Leeuwarden in 1621, for in that year he painted the group portrait of the local Verspeeck family.40 He was to spend the rest of his life in Leeuwarden. A Catholic, he married before the magistrate on 19 October 1622, his bride being Hendrickje Uylenburgh. One of Hendrickje’s cousins was the father of Saskia, Rembrandt’s wife. De Geest moved in lofty circles, was himself not without means, served as a regent of a charitable institution in 1639, and bore a coat of arms. His children and grandchildren even felt that they belonged to the Frisian aristocracy. His praises were sung by the poet Joost van den Vondel while he was still alive, and several eulogies were written about portraits of his. It is not known when he died, but it was between 1661 and 1665. His last works date from 1660, and there is also a letter he wrote in 1661. In 1665 his wife was recorded as being a widow.
Although Houbraken called him a ‘fine history and portrait painter’, almost all his surviving works are portraits. After his return from Rome he became the favourite portrait painter of Ernst Casimir of Nassau-Dietz (later Stadholder of Friesland) and his wife Sophia Hedwig of Braunschweig-Wolfenbu¨ttel, of their son Hendrik Casimir, and of the landed aristocracy of Friesland. Fragments from the diaries of Hendrik’s brother, Willem Frederik, record that he visited De Geest on more than one occasion ‘to have myself painted’. De Geest must have had a studio with assistants, given the many commissions he received, of which copies were often made. His pupils included Jacob Potma (c. 1610-80) and his son Julius Franciscus de Geest (?-1699). In the course of 40 years his portraiture evolved from the solemn, formal manner of Van Mierevelt and Van Ravesteyn to a more modern, fashionable style.
Yvette Bruijnen, 2007
References
Houbraken I, 1718, pp. 147-48; Campo Weyerman I, 1729, pp. 377-78; Descamps I, 1753, pp. 402-03; Hofstede de Groot 1889a; Hofstede de Groot in Thieme/Becker XIII, 1920, pp. 331-33; Wassenbergh 1967, pp. 37-40; De Vries 1982, pp. 9-11; Visser/Van der Plaat 1995, pp. 375, 479; De Vries in Turner 1996, XII, p. 233
The Leeuwarden Series: Members of the House of Nassau
Willem Frederik was born in Arnhem on 7 August 1613 to Ernst Casimir and Sophia Hedwig of Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, and was appointed Stadholder of Friesland on the death of his brother Hendrik Casimir I at the Battle of Hulst in 1640. He was particularly skilled in warfare, and from 1641 fought as a general in the battles again the Spanish. In 1651 he was also made Stadholder of Drenthe. It was in 1652 that he received Amalia van Solms’s permission to marry her daughter Albertina Agnes, who bore him one son, Hendrik Casimir II. In 1664 he secured a victory when the Prince-Bishop of Münster invaded the eastern Netherlands. He died the same year after an accident with a pistol and was buried in Leeuwarden.41
The spontaneous and rapid execution of the portrait, and the fact that there is no known prototype, indicate that it may have been done from life, or at least after a life drawing. It is clear from fragments of Willem Frederik’s own diary that this was not uncommon, for in 1647 he wrote: ‘I had myself painted by De Geest’, and in 1648: ‘Have myself painted Monday’.42
Yvette Bruijnen, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 370.
Wassenbergh 1967, p. 35, no. 39
1801, p. 48, no. 52 (without attribution); 1809, p. 92, no. 428 (without attribution); 1853, p. 36, no. 402 (as Anonymous; collective number for the Leeuwarden and Katzenelnbogen Series; fl. 2,000); 1858, p. 182, no. 402o (as R. Geest); 1880, pp. 371-72, no. 431ee (as Anonymous, 16th century, but with note of the signature); 1887, p. 49, no. 387; 1903, p. 103, no. 957; 1934, p. 105, no. 957; 1960, pp. 108-09, no. 957; 1976, p. 702, no. A 530; 2007, no. 370
Y. Bruijnen, 2007, 'Wybrand de (I) Geest, Portrait of Willem Frederik (1613-64), Count of Nassau-Dietz, 1632', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.6851
(accessed 24 November 2024 06:41:31).