Object data
oak with traces of polychromy
height 92 cm × width 41 cm × depth 26 cm
Henrik Douverman
Kalkar, c. 1520
oak with traces of polychromy
height 92 cm × width 41 cm × depth 26 cm
Carved almost entirely in the round and originally polychromed. The statue has a rectangular cavity on the reverse, closed with a board on which the image continues. The figure was made in four parts: St Ursula and her virgins, the board on the reverse and two added pieces for the small base. The quality of the wood is relatively poor with many cracks that have been partially filled with splines; this is an indication that the figure was meant to be polychromed.
The arrow in the right hand is missing. The headdress and the middle joint of the little finger of Ursula’s right hand have been replaced. The original polychromy has been removed with a caustic. Traces of polychromy were found in the deeper folds on the reverse.
...; collection Sir Adrian Conan Doyle (1910-1970), Schloss Lucens, Switserland;1 his sale, Bern (Galerie Jürg Stuker), 20 November-17 December 1974, no. 4736, Sf. 126,000 (fl. 123,006), to the museum, with the support from the Ministerie van Cultuur, Recreatie en Maatschappelijk Werk, the Vereniging Rembrandt and the Commissie voor Fotoverkoop on the occasion of the retirement of Dr A.F.E. van Schendel as director of the Rijksmuseum on 3 June 1975
Object number: BK-1975-70
Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
Copyright: Public domain
Henrik Douverman (? Dinslaken c. 1490 - Kalkar 1543/44)
In the nineteenth century, the maker of the well-known Retable of the Seven Sorrows of Mary in the Sankt-Nicolaikirche at Kalkar was identified by Wolff as Henrik Douverman (or He(i)nrick/h Douwermann), whose name he discovered in the city’s archives. Today he is considered to be the leading woodcarver of his day in the Lower Rhine region, with an ever-growing number of works attributed to his oeuvre.
Not much is known about Douverman’s early life, though some have traced his origin to Dinslaken (Germany), where a canon by the name of Johann Douverman resided, who was possibly his brother.2 Henrik was trained in Cleves in the workshop of the sculptor Dries Holthuys (active c. 1480-1510), alongside Henrick van Holt (c. 1480/90-1545/46), who would later become his competition. Douverman completed his apprenticeship around 1506. He is believed to have spent part of his Wanderjahre as a journeyman in Ulm, as a degree of stylistic influence from sculpture produced in that South-German city has been detected in his works.3 Certain, however, is that by 1510 he had returned to Cleves as affirmed by the frequent appearance of his name in local archival documents from that time onward. In subsequent years, he established a workshop and married. Douverman’s presence in Cleves is documented in debt records up until 1515. In 1517, he registered as a new citizen in Kalkar.
From 1518 to 1521, Douverman worked on his magnum opus, the Retable of the Seven Sorrows of Mary for the Nicolaikirche in Kalkar. In 1528, he was paid to repair and modify the massive Marianum in the same church.4 Another documented work is the Marian Altar for the former collegiate church of Cleves from 1513, though it appears Douverman abandoned this work due to a conflict of interest with his patrons, leaving the completion of the altar to the workshop of his former master, Dries Holthuys.5 In the end, it appears that Douverman was responsible only for the conception of the altar’s design and several of the earliest carvings.
Outside these specific commissions, Douverman’s name is documented nowhere up until his death in 1543/44, prompting speculation with respect to his social position. Other sculptors, including Arnt van Tricht (active c. 1530-d. 1570) – a pupil of Douverman – and Henrick van Holt, are known to have received numerous commissions from churches in the prosperous city of Xanten. Douverman appears to have experienced difficulty in securing work and may have abandoned his métier altogether as a woodcarver.6 Whatever the reason for his absence in the archives, a vast number of works have been attributed to Douverman, including works datable to the final years of his life, e.g. a Virgin Enthroned in Paris from circa 1540.7 While a Bishop (BK-NM-11537) preserved in the Rijksmuseum is clearly an example of Douverman’s workshop production, two other groups in the museum’s collection are unquestionably autograph works: a Virgin and Child (BK-BR-534) of circa 1510-15 and a St Ursula (BK-1975-70) of circa 1520, with the latter closely resembling a number of the female figures in the Retable of the Seven Sorrows of Mary.
Marie Mundigler, 2024
References
H.L.M. Defoer, ‘Einige sculpturen in het Museum Catharijneconvent nader bekeken’, in B. Rommé (ed.), Der Niederrhein und die alten Niederlande: Kunst und Kultur im späten Mittelalter: Referate des Kolloquiums zur Ausstellung ‘Gegen den Strom: Meisterwerke niederrheinischer Bildschnitzkunst in Zeiten der Reformation (1500-1550)’, Bielefeld 1999, pp. 135-45; W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Ursula-beeld door Henrik Douvermann’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 23 (1975), pp. 63-66; B. Rommé, Henrick Douwerman und die niederrheinische Bildschnitzkunst an der Wende zur Neuzeit, Bielefeld 1997, pp. 20-28; B. Rommé, Gegen den Strom: Meisterwerke niederrheinischer Skulptur in Zeiten der Reformation 1500-1550, exh. cat. Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 1996, pp. 15-37; B. Rommé, ‘Der Marienleuchter in St. Nickolai’, in B. Rommé (ed.), Der Niederrhein und die alten Niederlande: Kunst und Kultur im späten Mittelalter, Bielefeld 1999, pp. 68-97; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexicon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, vol. 9, Leipzig 1913, pp. 520-22; M. van Vlierden et al., Hout- en steensculptuur van Museum Catharijneconvent, ca. 1200-1600, coll. cat. Utrecht 2004, pp. 300-05; G. de Werd, Die St. Nicolaikirche in Kalkar, Munich/Berlin 2002, pp. 93-99, 110-13; De Werd in F. Scholten and G. de Werd, Een hogere werkelijkheid: Duitse en Franse beeldhouwkunst 1200-1600 uit het Rijksmuseum Amsterdam/Eine höhere Wirklichkeit, Deutsche und Französische Skulptur 1200-1600 aus dem Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, exh. cat. Cleves (Museum Kurhaus Kleve) 2004-06, nos. 12-14
The woodcarver followed the St Ursula iconography that was standard in the late Middle Ages, derived from the Schutzmantelmadonna: a standing, opulently dressed damsel providing protection for her travelling companions under her cloak. Ursula, the daughter of King Maurus of Britain, was murdered by the Huns in Cologne on the way back from her pilgrimage to Rome, together with the 11,000 virgins in her retinue. An active cult of veneration of the saint and her companions grew up in Cologne; the bones of the murdered women were kept in the Sankt-Ursula Balisika and other churches in Cologne. There are still more than a hundred medieval reliquary busts of Ursula’s companions in the ‘Golden Chamber’ in this basilica. Ursula is dressed according to the most luxurious fashion of the time, with a headdress of woven linen bands and a sheer, finely pleated chemisette or guimpe that shows above the square neckline of her gown. The saint reads a prayer in what is known as a girdle-book. In her right hand she held an arrow, the attribute of her martyrdom, now lost.
Halsema-Kubes and De Werd classify this Ursula under the mature style of the woodcarver Henrik Douverman, who worked in Cleves and Kalkar between 15108 and the year of his death, 1543/44.9 The statue would have been made around 1520, when Douverman was working in Kalkar on the Retable of the Seven Sorrows of Mary for the Sankt-Nicolaikirche (1518-22), with which it has many stylistic parallels. Rommé, however, thinks it more likely that it was made prior to 1518, before the carver embarked on the Kalkar altar.10 Many elements of Douverman’s style around 1520, both in the Kalkar altar and in a number of individual statues of saints, can be found in the Ursula. Closely related, but larger and more detailed, both in pose and the arrangement of the folds, are Douverman’s Mary Magdalene in the same church in Kalkar, and the Virgin Mary at the top of the Seven Sorrows altar.11 Since Rommé dates the Magdalene after 1522 on stylistic grounds, her dating of the Ursula four or five years earlier would seem hard to maintain.12 She also pointed to the similarity to a small sculpture of St Margaret in Berlin, but this comparison is less convincing.13 Ursula’s companions are reminiscent of the Virgin Mary in the Stiftskirche in Cleves and the Virgin in an Annunciation in Birgden (Selfkantkreis Geilenkirchen-Heinsberg).14 Variants of the female figures can also be found in the Seven Sorrows altar.
The wood used for the statue has many cracks that have been partially filled with splines; this is an indication that the figure was meant to be decorated, so an inferior quality wood could be used. There are far fewer cracks in the Seven Sorrows altar, which was designed to be left unpainted from the outset.15 In 1996 it was still thought that the statue, like the Mary Magdalene in Kalkar, had never been painted,16 but some traces of polychromy (possibly not original) that Mares found in the deeper folds of the garments attest to the contrary.17
The purpose of the figure and the place for which it was made are unknown, but it is likely that the Ursula comes from a convent. Because the saint was murdered defending her virginity, she was a highly suitable role model for nuns. By the late Middle Ages, the veneration of Ursula was no longer confined to Cologne and flourished throughout the Lower Rhine region, so several convents are possible candidates, as De Werd suggested.18 An important centre of Ursula veneration in the Lower Rhine region was the Cistercian Kamp Abbey, where many relics of Ursula’s companions were kept, and to a lesser degree the Cistercian convent at Gräfenthal near Goch. In 1413 Arnt Snoick founded the Great Beguinage or Augustinian Convent dedicated to St Ursula in Kalkar, and in 1430 Duke Adolph of Cleves granted the beguines permission to establish a chapel with an altar. It goes without saying that the convent’s patron saint would have had a central position on the altar. In 1578 the convent was dissolved by Duke William of Cleves and amalgamated with the Small Beguine Convent, dedicated to St Cecilia. In 1625 that convent was transformed into a monastery and it was secularized in 1802.19 Lastly, Ursula was venerated in the Augustinian Convent of St Ursula in Niederelten and as the second patron saint in the nunnery of Rees. De Werd suggested that one of these convents may have been the original provenance of the statue.20 Rommé thought that it would have been placed quite high up, for example in the pinnacle of a large altar, by analogy with the Virgin in the Seven Sorrows altar .21 The figure of Ursula seems to be too large for this, however, although the fact that the statue is worked in the round does suggest that it was placed where it could be viewed from all sides.
Frits Scholten, 2024
W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Ursula-beeld door Henrik Douvermann’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 23 (1975), pp. 63-66; Jaarverslag Nederlandse Rijksmusea 1976, pp. 22-23, fig. 11; B. Rommé et al., Gegen den Strom: Meisterwerke niederrheinischer Skulptur in Zeiten der Reformation 1500-1550, exh. cat. Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 1996, pp. 103-04 and no. 24; B. Rommé, Henrick Douwerman und die niederrheinische Bildschnitzkunst an der Wende zur Neuzeit, Bielefeld 1997, pp. 204-09, 311, no. 10; Scholten in H. van Os et al., Netherlandish art in the Rijksmuseum 1400-1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2000, no. 31; L. Goddard Kargère, ‘The Kalkar School of Carving: Attribution of a Wooden Polychromed Sculpture’, The Metropolitan Museum Journal 35 (2000), pp. 121-35, esp. p. 131 and fig. 21; G. de Werd, Die Nicolaikirche in Kalkar, Munich/Berlin 2002, pp. 127-28; De Werd in F. Scholten and G. de Werd, Een hogere werkelijkheid: Duitse en Franse beeldhouwkunst 1200-1600 uit het Rijksmuseum Amsterdam/Eine höhere Wirklichkeit, Deutsche und Französische Skulptur 1200-1600 aus dem Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, exh. cat. Cleves (Museum Kurhaus Kleve) 2004-06, no. 13; F. Scholten (ed.), 1100-1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2015, no. 50
F. Scholten, 2024, 'Hendrik Douverman, St Ursula and her Virgins, Kalkar, c. 1520', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.25717
(accessed 27 November 2024 09:37:50).